lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e0a9acb-e973-7371-8425-05e066db0827@email.cn>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jul 2021 18:04:45 +0800
From:   Hu Haowen <src.res@...il.cn>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, apw@...onical.com
Cc:     dwaipayanray1@...il.com, lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: add grammatical judgement for total output


On 2021/7/22 上午12:03, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-07-21 at 23:14 +0800, Hu Haowen wrote:
>> There lacked a English grammatical identification within the final
>> output of checkpatch.pl such as the following:
>>
>>     total: 1 errors, 11 warnings, 4094 lines checked
>>                   ^
>>
>> Which violated the rule about the usage of the singular form and the
>> plural form. Hence fix the issue up and make it output the proper
>> sentence.
> NAK
>
> I appreciate the desire for precision but I don't want to require
> any automated downstream user of checkpatch to be changed.
>
> I think users understand the output even though it may not be
> grammatically correct in some cases.


How about another modification, which turns "errors" into "error(s)"?
In this case not only did the meaning convey but automated users won't
be confused toward their automatic programs.


>> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> []
>> @@ -7439,9 +7439,14 @@ sub process {
>>  	print report_dump();
>>  	if ($summary && !($clean == 1 && $quiet == 1)) {
>>  		print "$filename " if ($summary_file);
>> -		print "total: $cnt_error errors, $cnt_warn warnings, " .
>> -			(($check)? "$cnt_chk checks, " : "") .
>> -			"$cnt_lines lines checked\n";
>> +		my $errors_str = ($cnt_error == 1) ? "error" : "errors";
>> +		my $warnings_str = ($cnt_warn == 1) ? "warning" : "warnings";
>> +		my $checks_str = ($cnt_chk == 1) ? "check" : "checks";
>> +		my $lines_str = ($cnt_lines == 1) ? "line" : "lines";
>> +		print "total: $cnt_error $errors_str, " .
>> +			"$cnt_warn $warnings_str, " .
>> +			(($check)? "$cnt_chk $checks_str, " : "") .
>> +			"$cnt_lines $lines_str checked\n";
>>  	}
>>  
>>
>>  	if ($quiet == 0) {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ