linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: mmc_spi: add spi:mmc-spi-slot alias

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VdUYVrHdhjZSi6stCF5kz2KadbiefWLsYgVy4Wm3QfJHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:36:04 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Tobias Schramm <t.schramm@...jaro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: mmc_spi: add spi:mmc-spi-slot alias

On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:28 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 1:03 PM Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de> wrote:
> > On Jul 21 2021, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > > Or problem is somewhere else?
> >
> > I don't know.  Why does the spi subsystem put "spi:mmc-spi-slot" into
> > the modalias file, instead of "of:N(null)T(null)Cmmc-spi-slot" or
> > similar?  The same problem exists with the other spi port on the board,
> > which has a jedec,spi-nor instance attached, also not auto loading.
>
> You see, there are two unrelated drivers that share the same issue
> (the common denominator is that they are SPI devices). I believe the
> issue is somewhere in the SPI core rather than here.
>
> Compare the code of
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c#L649
> vs.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/spi/spi.c#L56
>
> and
>
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c#L139
> vs.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/spi/spi.c#L361


> The culprit is this one:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190618052644.32446-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org/
>
> and in my humble opinion must be reverted.

Oops, I have been too fast. It's not related to SPI in general, sorry
guys. But the idea you have got from above, I believe.



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko