linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Fix possible memory leaks in wq_numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 22 Jul 2021 10:37:18 +0800
From:   "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
To:     Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
CC:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Fix possible memory leaks in wq_numa_init()



On 2021/7/22 9:55, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 3:00 PM Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com> wrote:
>>
>> In error handling branch "if (WARN_ON(node == NUMA_NO_NODE))", the
>> previously allocated memories are not released. Doing this before
>> allocating memory eliminates memory leaks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  kernel/workqueue.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
>>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
>> index 50142fc08902..6aa0ba582d15 100644
>> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
>> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
>> @@ -5896,6 +5896,14 @@ static void __init wq_numa_init(void)
>>                 return;
>>         }
>>
>> +       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> +               if (WARN_ON(cpu_to_node(cpu) == NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
>> +                       pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n", cpu);
>> +                       /* happens iff arch is bonkers, let's just proceed */
>> +                       return;
>> +               }
>> +       }
>> +
>>         wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf = alloc_workqueue_attrs();
>>         BUG_ON(!wq_update_unbound_numa_attrs_buf);
>>
>> @@ -5907,18 +5915,11 @@ static void __init wq_numa_init(void)
>>         tbl = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(tbl[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
>>         BUG_ON(!tbl);
>>
>> -       for_each_node(node)
>> +       for_each_node(node) {
>>                 BUG_ON(!zalloc_cpumask_var_node(&tbl[node], GFP_KERNEL,
>>                                 node_online(node) ? node : NUMA_NO_NODE));
>>
>> -       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>> -               node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
>> -               if (WARN_ON(node == NUMA_NO_NODE)) {
>> -                       pr_warn("workqueue: NUMA node mapping not available for cpu%d, disabling NUMA support\n", cpu);
>> -                       /* happens iff arch is bonkers, let's just proceed */
>> -                       return;
>> -               }
>> -               cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tbl[node]);
>> +               cpumask_copy(tbl[node], cpumask_of_node(node));
> 
> It is incorrect.  cpumask_of_node(node) is the online cpumask of the node, not
> the possible cpumask of the node that we are interested in.
> 
> If the NUMA subsystem provided something like cpumask_possible_of_node(node),
> we wouldn't need wq_numa_possible_cpumask.
> 
> Please keep "cpumask_copy(tbl[node], cpumask_of_node(node));" as before.

OK，thanks.

> 
>>         }
>>
>>         wq_numa_possible_cpumask = tbl;
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
> .
>