[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wg1n8yVeKABgfx7itM5o1jXVx6WXRF5PxHx+uqeFBmsmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 16:40:22 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
cluster-devel <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] iov_iter: Introduce fault_in_iov_iter helper
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 1:58 PM Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Introduce a new fault_in_iov_iter helper for manually faulting in an iterator.
> Other than fault_in_pages_writeable(), this function is non-destructive.
Again, as I pointed out in the previous version, "Other than" is not
sensible language.
You mean "Unlike".
Same issue in the comment:
> + * Other than fault_in_pages_writeable(), this function is non-destructive even
> + * when faulting in pages for writing.
It really should be
"Unlike fault_in_pages_writeable(), this function .."
to parse correctly.
I understand what you mean, but only because I know what
fault_in_pages_writeable() does and what the issue was.
And in a year or two, I might have forgotten, and wonder what you meant.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists