lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f92b245537d6390b7b2bde62ce8b99a3df9d445.camel@mediatek.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:17:25 +0800
From:   Ben Tseng <ben.tseng@...iatek.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Fan Chen <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
CC:     Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <hsinyi@...omium.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
        Michael Kao <michael.kao@...iatek.com>,
        Yu-Chia Chang <ethan.chang@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] thermal: mediatek: Add LVTS drivers for SoC
 theraml zones

On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 13:26 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 17/06/2021 13:47, Ben Tseng wrote:
> > From: Michael Kao <michael.kao@...iatek.com>
> > 
> > Add a LVTS (Low voltage thermal sensor) driver to report junction
> > temperatures in Mediatek SoC and register the maximum temperature
> > of sensors and each sensor as a thermal zone.
> 
> I think we already talked about that. We don't want a thermal sensor
> driver to aggregate the temperatures but create some kindof virtual
> sensor with a property (min, max, avg, ...) which is usable by
> anyone.
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> 
> 

Dear Daniel,

Sorry for the late reply.

After survey ,I'm not sure whether the patch[1] is the architecture of
virtual thermal sensor which you commented.

Or, is there any existing framework on mainline already support virtual
sensor?
Could you help to provide reference to us?
Thank you so much.

[1] 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/patch/1606466204-31657-1-git-send-email-gao.yunxiao6@gmail.com/

BRs
Ben



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ