[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210723064328.GA7986@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:43:28 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 1/2] crypto: tcrypt: minimal conversion to run under
KUnit
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 02:31:37PM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
>> == Questions ==
> * does this seem like it would make running the test easier?
I don't mind. tcrypt these days isn't used so much for correctness
testing. It's mostly being used for speed testing. A secondary
use is to instantiate templates.
> * does `tvmem` actually need page-aligned buffers?
I think it may be needed for those split-SG test cases where
we deliberately create a buffer that straddles a page boundary.
> * I have no clue how FIPS intersects with all of this.
It doesn't really matter because in FIPS mode when a correctness
test fails the kernel panics.
> * would it be fine to leave the test code built-in for FIPS instead of
> returning -EAGAIN?
The returning -EAGAIN is irrelevant in FIPS mode. It's more of
an aid in normal mode when you use tcrypt for speed testing.
Thanks,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists