linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] mm/sparse: clarify pgdat_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a042906d-7d07-d1af-57d2-ab4cbdc53f36@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:10:53 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, wsd_upstream@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] mm/sparse: clarify pgdat_to_phys

On 23.07.21 09:01, Miles Chen wrote:
> Clarify pgdat_to_phys() by testing if
> pgdat == &contig_page_data when CONFIG_NUMA=n.
> 
> contig_page_data is only available when CONFIG_NUMA=n
> so we have to use #ifndef here.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Comment from Mark [1]:
> "
> ... and I reckon it'd be clearer and more robust to define
> pgdat_to_phys() in the same ifdefs as contig_page_data so
> that these, stay in-sync. e.g. have:
> 
> | #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> | #define pgdat_to_phys(x)	virt_to_phys(x)
> | #else /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> |
> | extern struct pglist_data contig_page_data;
> | ...
> | #define pgdat_to_phys(x)	__pa_symbol(&contig_page_data)
> |
> | #endif /* CONIFIG_NUMA */
> "
> 
> Comment from Mike [2]:
> "
> I'm not sure a macro is better than a static inline.
> 
> Maybe we'd want to warn if pgdat passed to pgtat_to_phys() is not
> &contig_page_data, e.g something like
> 
> static inline phys_addr_t pgdat_to_phys(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
> {
> 	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)) {
> 		if (pgdat == &contig_page_data)
> 			return __pa_symbol(&contig_page_data);
> 		else
> 			pr_warn("Unexpected pglist_data pointer!\n");
> 	}
> 
> 	return __pa(pgdat);
> }
> "
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210615131902.GB47121@C02TD0UTHF1T.local/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1452903/#1650759
> 
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> Change since v1:
> Thanks for Mike's comment, check if pgdat == &contig_page_data,
> so it is clearer that we only expect contig_page_data when
> CONFIG_NUMA=n.
> ---
>   mm/sparse.c | 7 ++++---
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
> index 6326cdf36c4f..f73ff3c124c5 100644
> --- a/mm/sparse.c
> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> @@ -348,10 +348,11 @@ size_t mem_section_usage_size(void)
>   static inline phys_addr_t pgdat_to_phys(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
>   {
>   #ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
> -	return __pa_symbol(pgdat);
> -#else
> +	if (pgdat == &contig_page_data)
> +		return __pa_symbol(&contig_page_data);
> +	pr_warn("Unexpected pglist_data pointer!\n");

Shouldn't this rather be a VM_BUG_ON()?

Because it looks like something that should barely happen and we might 
not want to perform runtime checks on each and every system?


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb