lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8735s530rx.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jul 2021 09:14:10 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 4/8] PCI/MSI: Enforce MSI[X] entry updates to be visible

On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 22:54:48 +0100,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
> On Friday, July 23, 2021, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 09:11:30PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Nothing enforces the posted writes to be visible when the function
> > > returns. Flush them even if the flush might be redundant when the entry
> > is
> > > masked already as the unmask will flush as well. This is either setup or
> > a
> > > rare affinity change event so the extra flush is not the end of the
> > world.
> > >
> > > While this is more a theoretical issue especially the X86 MSI affinity
> > > stter mechanism relies on the assumption that the update has reached the
> >
> > stter?
> 
> 
> Setter I suppose

My bet is on 'steer', given that this is about affinity management.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ