[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uHG0T7kgHzrkxoGj+Cv1-5f=GaH1CviunoZd_wEL5G4YQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:24:32 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Nikola Cornij <nikola.cornij@....com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Nouveau Dev <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: fix build failure with CONFIG_BACKLIGHT=n
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 11:15 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> When the backlight support is disabled, the driver fails to build:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c: In function 'nv50_sor_atomic_disable':
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:1665:59: error: 'struct nouveau_connector' has no member named 'backlight'
> 1665 | struct nouveau_backlight *backlight = nv_connector->backlight;
> | ^~
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:1670:35: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct nouveau_backlight'
> 1670 | if (backlight && backlight->uses_dpcd) {
> | ^~
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c:1671:64: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct nouveau_backlight'
> 1671 | ret = drm_edp_backlight_disable(aux, &backlight->edp_info);
> | ^~
>
> The patch that introduced the problem already contains some #ifdef
> checks, so just add another one that makes it build again.
>
> Fixes: 6eca310e8924 ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Add basic DPCD backlight support for nouveau")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Can we just toss the idea that BACKTLIGHT=n is a reasonable config for
drm drivers using backlights, and add depends BACKLIGHT to all of
them?
I mean this is a perfect source of continued patch streams to keep us
all busy, but beyond that I really don't see the point ... I frankly
have better things to do, and especially with the big drivers we have
making backlight optional saves comparitively nothing.
-Daniel
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> index 093e1f7163b3..fcf53e24db21 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c
> @@ -1659,20 +1659,23 @@ static void
> nv50_sor_atomic_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder, struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> {
> struct nouveau_encoder *nv_encoder = nouveau_encoder(encoder);
> - struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(nv_encoder->base.base.dev);
> struct nouveau_crtc *nv_crtc = nouveau_crtc(nv_encoder->crtc);
> struct nouveau_connector *nv_connector = nv50_outp_get_old_connector(state, nv_encoder);
> - struct nouveau_backlight *backlight = nv_connector->backlight;
> struct drm_dp_aux *aux = &nv_connector->aux;
> - int ret;
> u8 pwr;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DRM_NOUVEAU_BACKLIGHT
> + struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(nv_encoder->base.base.dev);
> + struct nouveau_backlight *backlight = nv_connector->backlight;
> +
> if (backlight && backlight->uses_dpcd) {
> - ret = drm_edp_backlight_disable(aux, &backlight->edp_info);
> + int ret = drm_edp_backlight_disable(aux, &backlight->edp_info);
> +
> if (ret < 0)
> NV_ERROR(drm, "Failed to disable backlight on [CONNECTOR:%d:%s]: %d\n",
> nv_connector->base.base.id, nv_connector->base.name, ret);
> }
> +#endif
>
> if (nv_encoder->dcb->type == DCB_OUTPUT_DP) {
> int ret = drm_dp_dpcd_readb(aux, DP_SET_POWER, &pwr);
> --
> 2.29.2
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
Powered by blists - more mailing lists