linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 09/19] sfc: ensure correct number of XDP queues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACT4oucVa5Lw538M2TEc1ZNU4mUZms+9fiTxw-p5-7J7xcM+kQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jul 2021 12:12:30 +0200
From:   Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.13 09/19] sfc: ensure correct number of XDP queues

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 5:57 AM Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 788bc000d4c2f25232db19ab3a0add0ba4e27671 ]

Applying this commit alone could be problematic, leading even to
kernel crash in certain situations.

The real fix is the previous one of the series:
f43a24f446da sfc: fix lack of XDP TX queues - error XDP TX failed (-22)

This one can be applied too, but not really a must-have.

> Commit 99ba0ea616aa ("sfc: adjust efx->xdp_tx_queue_count with the real
> number of initialized queues") intended to fix a problem caused by a
> round up when calculating the number of XDP channels and queues.
> However, this was not the real problem. The real problem was that the
> number of XDP TX queues had been reduced to half in
> commit e26ca4b53582 ("sfc: reduce the number of requested xdp ev queues"),
> but the variable xdp_tx_queue_count had remained the same.
>
> Once the correct number of XDP TX queues is created again in the
> previous patch of this series, this also can be reverted since the error
> doesn't actually exist.
>
> Only in the case that there is a bug in the code we can have different
> values in xdp_queue_number and efx->xdp_tx_queue_count. Because of this,
> and per Edward Cree's suggestion, I add instead a WARN_ON to catch if it
> happens again in the future.
>
> Note that the number of allocated queues can be higher than the number
> of used ones due to the round up, as explained in the existing comment
> in the code. That's why we also have to stop increasing xdp_queue_number
> beyond efx->xdp_tx_queue_count.
>
> Signed-off-by: Íñigo Huguet <ihuguet@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c | 15 ++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c
> index a3ca406a3561..bea0b27baf4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_channels.c
> @@ -891,18 +891,20 @@ int efx_set_channels(struct efx_nic *efx)
>                         if (efx_channel_is_xdp_tx(channel)) {
>                                 efx_for_each_channel_tx_queue(tx_queue, channel) {
>                                         tx_queue->queue = next_queue++;
> -                                       netif_dbg(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, "Channel %u TXQ %u is XDP %u, HW %u\n",
> -                                                 channel->channel, tx_queue->label,
> -                                                 xdp_queue_number, tx_queue->queue);
> +
>                                         /* We may have a few left-over XDP TX
>                                          * queues owing to xdp_tx_queue_count
>                                          * not dividing evenly by EFX_MAX_TXQ_PER_CHANNEL.
>                                          * We still allocate and probe those
>                                          * TXQs, but never use them.
>                                          */
> -                                       if (xdp_queue_number < efx->xdp_tx_queue_count)
> +                                       if (xdp_queue_number < efx->xdp_tx_queue_count) {
> +                                               netif_dbg(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, "Channel %u TXQ %u is XDP %u, HW %u\n",
> +                                                         channel->channel, tx_queue->label,
> +                                                         xdp_queue_number, tx_queue->queue);
>                                                 efx->xdp_tx_queues[xdp_queue_number] = tx_queue;
> -                                       xdp_queue_number++;
> +                                               xdp_queue_number++;
> +                                       }
>                                 }
>                         } else {
>                                 efx_for_each_channel_tx_queue(tx_queue, channel) {
> @@ -914,8 +916,7 @@ int efx_set_channels(struct efx_nic *efx)
>                         }
>                 }
>         }
> -       if (xdp_queue_number)
> -               efx->xdp_tx_queue_count = xdp_queue_number;
> +       WARN_ON(xdp_queue_number != efx->xdp_tx_queue_count);
>
>         rc = netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(efx->net_dev, efx->n_tx_channels);
>         if (rc)
> --
> 2.30.2
>

-- 
Íñigo Huguet