[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YPq3HvKWvChRp45A@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 15:33:34 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Check for endpoints in fwnode->secondary more
sensibly
On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 09:19:27PM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote:
> Hello all
>
> A while ago I patched fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() to check for endpoints
> against fwnode->secondary if none was found against the primary. It's actually
> better to do this in fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() instead, since that
> function is called by fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() and also directly called
> in a bunch of other places (primarily sensor drivers checking that they have
> endpoints connected during probe). This small series just adds the equivalent
> functionality to fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() and reverts the earlier
> commit.
Makes sense to me (one nit-pick to patch 1, though).
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Daniel Scally (2):
> device property: Check fwnode->secondary in
> fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint()
> Revert "media: device property: Call fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id()
> for fwnode->secondary"
>
> drivers/base/property.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists