[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c666746-a4bd-5111-1512-58d030987f8b@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:58:33 +0200
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
To: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kate Carcia <kcarcia@...hat.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>,
Luis Claudio R. Gonçalves <lclaudio@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] CFP: Real-Time Microconference - Linux Plumbers Conference
2021
The Real-time microconference focuses on finishing the last lap of getting the
PREEMPT_RT[1] patch set into mainline. Many of these missing pieces, however,
are not at the core of real-time features (like locking, and scheduling), but
instead, on other subsystems that compose the kernel, like file systems and
memory management. Making this Linux subsystems compatible with PREEMPT_RT
requires finding a solution that is acceptable by subsystem maintainer, without
having these subsystems suffer from performance or complexity issues.
Suggested Topics:
- New tools for PREEMPT_RT analysis [2].
- How do we teach the rest of the kernel developers how not to break
PREEMPT_RT?
- Stable maintainers tools discussion & improvements: [3]
- The usage of PREEMPT_RT on safety-critical systems: what do we need to do?
- Make NAPI and the kernel-rt working better together [5]
- Migrate disable and the problems that they cause on rt tasks [6]
- It is time to discuss the "BKL"-like style of our preempt/bh/irq_disable()
synchronization functions.
- How do we close the documentation gap
- The status of the merge, and how can we resolve the last issues that block
the merge
- Invite the developers of the areas where patches are still under discussion
to help to find an agreement
- How can we improve the testing of the -rt, to follow the problems raised as
Linus tree advances?
- What’s next?
If you are interested in participating in this microconference and have topics
to propose, please use the LPC CfP process, and select "Real-time MC" for the
"Track". More topics will be added based on CfP for LPC microconference.
MC leads:
- Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
- Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
- Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
- Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...cle.com>
- Kate Stewart <stewart@...ux.com>
Links:
[1] https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/realtime/start
[2] https://github.com/bristot/rtsl/
[3] https://github.com/igaw/stable-rt-tools
[4] https://www.linux.com/news/in-the-trenches-with-thomas-gleixner-real-time-linux-kernel-patch-set/
[5] Discussions:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210514222402.295157-1-kuba@kernel.org/
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YJofplWBz8dT7xiw@localhost.localdomain/
[6] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200924082717.GA1362448@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net/T/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists