linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 6/9] dax/kmem: use a single static memory group for a single probed unit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:52:07 +0200
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Marek Kedzierski <mkedzier@...hat.com>,
        Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>,
        Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@...il.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/9] dax/kmem: use a single static memory group for a single probed unit

Although dax/kmem users often disable auto-onlining and instead online
memory manually (usually to ZONE_MOVABLE), there is still value in
having auto-onlining be aware of the relationship of memory blocks.

Let's treat one probed unit as a single static memory device, similar to
a single ACPI memory device.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/dax/kmem.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dax/kmem.c b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
index 99e0f60c4c26..b528f85de845 100644
--- a/drivers/dax/kmem.c
+++ b/drivers/dax/kmem.c
@@ -37,15 +37,16 @@ static int dax_kmem_range(struct dev_dax *dev_dax, int i, struct range *r)
 
 struct dax_kmem_data {
 	const char *res_name;
+	int mgid;
 	struct resource *res[];
 };
 
 static int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
 {
 	struct device *dev = &dev_dax->dev;
+	unsigned long total_len = 0;
 	struct dax_kmem_data *data;
-	int rc = -ENOMEM;
-	int i, mapped = 0;
+	int i, rc, mapped = 0;
 	int numa_node;
 
 	/*
@@ -61,24 +62,44 @@ static int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	for (i = 0; i < dev_dax->nr_range; i++) {
+		struct range range;
+
+		rc = dax_kmem_range(dev_dax, i, &range);
+		if (rc) {
+			dev_info(dev, "mapping%d: %#llx-%#llx too small after alignment\n",
+					i, range.start, range.end);
+			continue;
+		}
+		total_len += range_len(&range);
+	}
+
+	if (!total_len) {
+		dev_warn(dev, "rejecting DAX region without any memory after alignment\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	data = kzalloc(struct_size(data, res, dev_dax->nr_range), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!data)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	rc = -ENOMEM;
 	data->res_name = kstrdup(dev_name(dev), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!data->res_name)
 		goto err_res_name;
 
+	rc = register_static_memory_group(numa_node, total_len);
+	if (rc < 0)
+		goto err_reg_mgid;
+	data->mgid = rc;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < dev_dax->nr_range; i++) {
 		struct resource *res;
 		struct range range;
 
 		rc = dax_kmem_range(dev_dax, i, &range);
-		if (rc) {
-			dev_info(dev, "mapping%d: %#llx-%#llx too small after alignment\n",
-					i, range.start, range.end);
+		if (rc)
 			continue;
-		}
 
 		/* Region is permanently reserved if hotremove fails. */
 		res = request_mem_region(range.start, range_len(&range), data->res_name);
@@ -108,8 +129,8 @@ static int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
 		 * Ensure that future kexec'd kernels will not treat
 		 * this as RAM automatically.
 		 */
-		rc = add_memory_driver_managed(numa_node, range.start,
-				range_len(&range), kmem_name, MHP_NONE);
+		rc = add_memory_driver_managed(data->mgid, range.start,
+				range_len(&range), kmem_name, MHP_NID_IS_MGID);
 
 		if (rc) {
 			dev_warn(dev, "mapping%d: %#llx-%#llx memory add failed\n",
@@ -129,6 +150,8 @@ static int dev_dax_kmem_probe(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
 	return 0;
 
 err_request_mem:
+	unregister_memory_group(data->mgid);
+err_reg_mgid:
 	kfree(data->res_name);
 err_res_name:
 	kfree(data);
@@ -171,6 +194,7 @@ static void dev_dax_kmem_remove(struct dev_dax *dev_dax)
 	}
 
 	if (success >= dev_dax->nr_range) {
+		unregister_memory_group(data->mgid);
 		kfree(data->res_name);
 		kfree(data);
 		dev_set_drvdata(dev, NULL);
-- 
2.31.1