linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add Pinctrl for SM4250/6115

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdZa1apQtmwxMeFxA=Mh2DNV_ggX8JtO8AoZ5eR0pWHEEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 23 Jul 2021 17:38:19 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, Andy
        Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>," 
        <~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add Pinctrl for SM4250/6115

On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 8:56 PM Iskren Chernev <iskren.chernev@...il.com> wrote:

> This patch adds support for the TLMM block on QCom SM4250 and SM6115, codename
> bengal. The code is taken from OnePlus repo [1]. The two platforms are
> identical so there is only one compat string.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/OnePlusOSS/android_kernel_oneplus_sm4250
>
> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/22/1163
> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/25/28
> v3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/25/72
> v4: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/25/351

I wanted to apply this v5 version but it doesn't apply cleanly on v5.14-rc1
and I am worried about making mistakes.

Can you collect the final review tags, rebase this on a clean
v5.14-rc1 and resend as v6?

Thanks!
Linus Walleij