[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOQ4uxgbqyyhQ+78j0L+GxkEJ8rOW43X9ann_kMs1098WkNe8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 10:36:05 +0300
From: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
overlayfs <linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ovl: uninitialized pointer read in ovl_lookup_real_one
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 1:26 AM Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Static analysis with Coverity has detected an uninitialized pointer read
> in function ovl_lookup_real_one in fs/overlayfs/export.c
>
> The issue was introduced with the following commit:
>
> commit 3985b70a3e3f58109dc6ae347eafe6e8610be41e
> Author: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>
> Date: Thu Dec 28 18:36:16 2017 +0200
>
> ovl: decode connected upper dir file handles
>
> The analysis is as follows:
>
> 365static struct dentry *ovl_lookup_real_one(struct dentry *connected,
> 366 struct dentry *real,
> 367 const struct ovl_layer *layer)
> 368{
> 369 struct inode *dir = d_inode(connected);
> 370 struct dentry *this, *parent = NULL;
>
> 1. var_decl: Declaring variable name without initializer.
>
> 371 struct name_snapshot name;
> 372 int err;
> 373
> 374 /*
> 375 * Lookup child overlay dentry by real name. The dir mutex
> protects us
> 376 * from racing with overlay rename. If the overlay dentry
> that is above
> 377 * real has already been moved to a parent that is not under the
> 378 * connected overlay dir, we return -ECHILD and restart the
> lookup of
> 379 * connected real path from the top.
> 380 */
> 381 inode_lock_nested(dir, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
> 382 err = -ECHILD;
> 383 parent = dget_parent(real);
>
> 2. Condition ovl_dentry_real_at(connected, layer->idx) != parent,
> taking true branch.
>
> 384 if (ovl_dentry_real_at(connected, layer->idx) != parent)
>
> 3. Jumping to label fail.
>
> 385 goto fail;
> 386
> 387 /*
> 388 * We also need to take a snapshot of real dentry name to
> protect us
> 389 * from racing with underlying layer rename. In this case, we
> don't
> 390 * care about returning ESTALE, only from dereferencing a
> free name
> 391 * pointer because we hold no lock on the real dentry.
> 392 */
> 393 take_dentry_name_snapshot(&name, real);
> 394 this = lookup_one_len(name.name.name, connected, name.name.len);
> 395 err = PTR_ERR(this);
> 396 if (IS_ERR(this)) {
> 397 goto fail;
> 398 } else if (!this || !this->d_inode) {
> 399 dput(this);
> 400 err = -ENOENT;
> 401 goto fail;
> 402 } else if (ovl_dentry_real_at(this, layer->idx) != real) {
> 403 dput(this);
> 404 err = -ESTALE;
> 405 goto fail;
> 406 }
> 407
> 408out:
>
> Uninitialized pointer read
> 6. uninit_use_in_call: Using uninitialized value name.name.name when
> calling release_dentry_name_snapshot.
>
> 409 release_dentry_name_snapshot(&name);
> 410 dput(parent);
> 411 inode_unlock(dir);
> 412 return this;
> 413
> 414fail:
>
> 4. Condition ___ratelimit(&_rs, <anonymous>), taking false branch
> .
> 415 pr_warn_ratelimited("failed to lookup one by real (%pd2,
> layer=%d, connected=%pd2, err=%i)\n",
> 416 real, layer->idx, connected, err);
> 417 this = ERR_PTR(err);
>
> 5. Jumping to label out.
>
> 418 goto out;
> 419}
>
> The error exit path on line 395 ends up with an uninitialized structure
> name being passed to function release_dentry_name_snapshot() on line 409
> and this accesses the pointer name.name.name, see /fs/dcache.c as follows:
>
> 303void release_dentry_name_snapshot(struct name_snapshot *name)
> 304{
>
> 1. read_value: Reading value name->name.name.
> 2. Condition !!(name->name.name != name->inline_name), taking true
> branch.
>
> 305 if (unlikely(name->name.name != name->inline_name)) {
> 306 struct external_name *p;
>
> 3. Condition 0 /* !!(!__builtin_types_compatible_p() &&
> !__builtin_types_compatible_p()) */, taking false branch.
>
>
> I suspect name should be initialized in line 371, e.g. name = { } and a
> null name check should be performed on line 409 before calling
> release_dentry_name_snapshot, but this seems a bit message as a fix.
>
Thanks for the report.
A simpler fix is to move take_dentry_name_snapshot() to top of the
function before goto fail.
Thanks,
Amir.
> Colin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists