linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] staging/fbtft: Fix braces coding style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210725140204.GB1953@titan>
Date:   Sun, 25 Jul 2021 16:02:04 +0200
From:   Len Baker <len.baker@....com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Len Baker <len.baker@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>,
        DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] staging/fbtft: Fix braces coding style

Hi,

On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 08:01:53PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Len,
>
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 7:44 PM Len Baker <len.baker@....com> wrote:
> > Add braces to the "for" loop and remove braces from the "if" statement.
> > This way the kernel coding style is followed.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Len Baker <len.baker@....com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-core.c
>
> > @@ -1016,10 +1018,9 @@ int fbtft_init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
> >
> >         i = 0;
> >         while (i < FBTFT_MAX_INIT_SEQUENCE) {
> > -               if (par->init_sequence[i] == -3) {
> > -                       /* done */
> > -                       return 0;
> > -               }
>
> These braces should not be removed, due to the presence of
> the comment.

Ok, I leave it as is.

Thanks,
Len