[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87o8aqt7qn.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 15:16:00 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the printk tree
Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name> writes:
> Chris Down writes:
>>+Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
>
> Well, let's actually Cc them this time...
>
>>Stephen Rothwell writes:
>>>After merging the printk tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
>>>produced this warning:
>>>
>>>kernel/printk/printk.c:1: warning: 'printk' not found
>>>
>>>Introduced by commit
>>>
>>> 337015573718 ("printk: Userspace format indexing support")
>>>
>>>I presume that "printk" is referred to elsewhere in the documentation
>>>as being in this file.
>>
>>Hmm, this is an interesting one, because I think we still generally
>>just want to refer to the API as being `printk()`. Changing it all
>>over the place seems wrong. As you'd imagine, there are quite a few
>>references to this name, so it requires a lot of noise all over the
>>docs and inline comments.
>>
>>Jonathan and other docs folks, how can one tell Sphinx that when it
>>sees printk() it's referring to a function-like macro, or otherwise
>>squelch this reasonably? :-)
The problem is that you moved printk(), but left the associated
kerneldoc comment tied to _printk(), which isn't what you really want to
document. The fix should look something like the attached.
Thanks,
jon
--------snip here----------------------
printk: Move the printk() kerneldoc comment to its new home
Commit 337015573718 ("printk: Userspace format indexing support") turned
printk() into a macro, but left the kerneldoc comment for it with the (now)
_printk() function, resulting in this docs-build warning:
kernel/printk/printk.c:1: warning: 'printk' not found
Move the kerneldoc comment back next to the (now) macro it's meant to
describe and have the docs build find it there.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
---
Documentation/core-api/printk-basics.rst | 5 +----
include/linux/printk.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/printk/printk.c | 24 ------------------------
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/printk-basics.rst b/Documentation/core-api/printk-basics.rst
index 965e4281eddd..2dde24ca7d9f 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/printk-basics.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/printk-basics.rst
@@ -107,9 +107,6 @@ also ``CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG`` in the case of pr_debug()) is defined.
Function reference
==================
-.. kernel-doc:: kernel/printk/printk.c
- :functions: printk
-
.. kernel-doc:: include/linux/printk.h
- :functions: pr_emerg pr_alert pr_crit pr_err pr_warn pr_notice pr_info
+ :functions: printk pr_emerg pr_alert pr_crit pr_err pr_warn pr_notice pr_info
pr_fmt pr_debug pr_devel pr_cont
diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h
index 2651b82ed352..c1e176403967 100644
--- a/include/linux/printk.h
+++ b/include/linux/printk.h
@@ -431,6 +431,30 @@ struct pi_entry {
})
+/**
+ * printk - print a kernel message
+ * @fmt: format string
+ *
+ * This is printk(). It can be called from any context. We want it to work.
+ *
+ * If printk indexing is enabled, _printk() is called from printk_index_wrap.
+ * Otherwise, printk is simply #defined to _printk.
+ *
+ * We try to grab the console_lock. If we succeed, it's easy - we log the
+ * output and call the console drivers. If we fail to get the semaphore, we
+ * place the output into the log buffer and return. The current holder of
+ * the console_sem will notice the new output in console_unlock(); and will
+ * send it to the consoles before releasing the lock.
+ *
+ * One effect of this deferred printing is that code which calls printk() and
+ * then changes console_loglevel may break. This is because console_loglevel
+ * is inspected when the actual printing occurs.
+ *
+ * See also:
+ * printf(3)
+ *
+ * See the vsnprintf() documentation for format string extensions over C99.
+ */
#define printk(fmt, ...) printk_index_wrap(_printk, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
#define printk_deferred(fmt, ...) \
printk_index_wrap(_printk_deferred, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index 9b3bd6e017f1..63176be3b50c 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -2186,30 +2186,6 @@ int vprintk_default(const char *fmt, va_list args)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vprintk_default);
-/**
- * _printk - print a kernel message
- * @fmt: format string
- *
- * This is _printk(). It can be called from any context. We want it to work.
- *
- * If printk indexing is enabled, _printk() is called from printk_index_wrap.
- * Otherwise, printk is simply #defined to _printk.
- *
- * We try to grab the console_lock. If we succeed, it's easy - we log the
- * output and call the console drivers. If we fail to get the semaphore, we
- * place the output into the log buffer and return. The current holder of
- * the console_sem will notice the new output in console_unlock(); and will
- * send it to the consoles before releasing the lock.
- *
- * One effect of this deferred printing is that code which calls printk() and
- * then changes console_loglevel may break. This is because console_loglevel
- * is inspected when the actual printing occurs.
- *
- * See also:
- * printf(3)
- *
- * See the vsnprintf() documentation for format string extensions over C99.
- */
asmlinkage __visible int _printk(const char *fmt, ...)
{
va_list args;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists