[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210726153839.982837555@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:37:31 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 018/167] bonding: fix suspicious RCU usage in bond_ipsec_del_sa()
From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit a22c39b831a081da9b2c488bd970a4412d926f30 ]
To dereference bond->curr_active_slave, it uses rcu_dereference().
But it and the caller doesn't acquire RCU so a warning occurs.
So add rcu_read_lock().
Test commands:
ip netns add A
ip netns exec A bash
modprobe netdevsim
echo "1 1" > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device
ip link add bond0 type bond
ip link set eth0 master bond0
ip link set eth0 up
ip link set bond0 up
ip x s add proto esp dst 14.1.1.1 src 15.1.1.1 spi 0x07 mode \
transport reqid 0x07 replay-window 32 aead 'rfc4106(gcm(aes))' \
0x44434241343332312423222114131211f4f3f2f1 128 sel src 14.0.0.52/24 \
dst 14.0.0.70/24 proto tcp offload dev bond0 dir in
ip x s f
Splat looks like:
=============================
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
5.13.0-rc3+ #1168 Not tainted
-----------------------------
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c:448 suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
2 locks held by ip/705:
#0: ffff888106701780 (&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x59/0x80 [xfrm_user]
#1: ffff8880075b0098 (&x->lock){+.-.}-{2:2},
at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30
stack backtrace:
CPU: 6 PID: 705 Comm: ip Not tainted 5.13.0-rc3+ #1168
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0xa4/0xe5
bond_ipsec_del_sa+0x16a/0x1c0 [bonding]
__xfrm_state_delete+0x51f/0x730
xfrm_state_delete+0x1e/0x30
xfrm_state_flush+0x22f/0x390
xfrm_flush_sa+0xd8/0x260 [xfrm_user]
? xfrm_flush_policy+0x290/0x290 [xfrm_user]
xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x331/0x660 [xfrm_user]
? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x91/0xc0
? xfrm_user_state_lookup.constprop.39+0x320/0x320 [xfrm_user]
? find_held_lock+0x3a/0x1c0
? mutex_lock_io_nested+0x1210/0x1210
? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x170
netlink_rcv_skb+0x121/0x350
[ ... ]
Fixes: 18cb261afd7b ("bonding: support hardware encryption offload to slaves")
Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index a66d639c415f..952796fb5f1a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -428,21 +428,24 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
if (!bond_dev)
return;
+ rcu_read_lock();
bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
if (!slave)
- return;
+ goto out;
xs->xso.real_dev = slave->dev;
if (!(slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops
&& slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete)) {
slave_warn(bond_dev, slave->dev, "%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_delete\n", __func__);
- return;
+ goto out;
}
slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(xs);
+out:
+ rcu_read_unlock();
}
/**
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists