lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:37:32 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> Subject: [PATCH 5.10 019/167] bonding: disallow setting nested bonding + ipsec offload From: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com> [ Upstream commit b121693381b112b78c076dea171ee113e237c0e4 ] bonding interface can be nested and it supports ipsec offload. So, it allows setting the nested bonding + ipsec scenario. But code does not support this scenario. So, it should be disallowed. interface graph: bond2 | bond1 | eth0 The nested bonding + ipsec offload may not a real usecase. So, disallowing this scenario is fine. Fixes: 18cb261afd7b ("bonding: support hardware encryption offload to slaves") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org> --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c index 952796fb5f1a..3555798879f2 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c @@ -403,8 +403,9 @@ static int bond_ipsec_add_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs) xs->xso.real_dev = slave->dev; bond->xs = xs; - if (!(slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops - && slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add)) { + if (!slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops || + !slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add || + netif_is_bond_master(slave->dev)) { slave_warn(bond_dev, slave->dev, "Slave does not support ipsec offload\n"); rcu_read_unlock(); return -EINVAL; @@ -437,8 +438,9 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs) xs->xso.real_dev = slave->dev; - if (!(slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops - && slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete)) { + if (!slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops || + !slave->dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete || + netif_is_bond_master(slave->dev)) { slave_warn(bond_dev, slave->dev, "%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_delete\n", __func__); goto out; } @@ -463,8 +465,9 @@ static bool bond_ipsec_offload_ok(struct sk_buff *skb, struct xfrm_state *xs) if (BOND_MODE(bond) != BOND_MODE_ACTIVEBACKUP) return true; - if (!(slave_dev->xfrmdev_ops - && slave_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_offload_ok)) { + if (!slave_dev->xfrmdev_ops || + !slave_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_offload_ok || + netif_is_bond_master(slave_dev)) { slave_warn(bond_dev, slave_dev, "%s: no slave xdo_dev_offload_ok\n", __func__); return false; } -- 2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists