[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210726153844.352613838@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:39:40 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 147/167] memblock: make for_each_mem_range() traverse MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG regions
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
commit 79e482e9c3ae86e849c701c846592e72baddda5a upstream.
Commit b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with
for_each_mem_range()") didn't take into account that when there is
movable_node parameter in the kernel command line, for_each_mem_range()
would skip ranges marked with MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG.
The page table setup code in POWER uses for_each_mem_range() to create
the linear mapping of the physical memory and since the regions marked
as MEMORY_HOTPLUG are skipped, they never make it to the linear map.
A later access to the memory in those ranges will fail:
BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on write at 0xc000000400000000
Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000008a3c0
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 53 Comm: kworker/u2:0 Not tainted 5.13.0 #7
NIP: c00000000008a3c0 LR: c0000000003c1ed8 CTR: 0000000000000040
REGS: c000000008a57770 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (5.13.0)
MSR: 8000000002009033 <SF,VEC,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 84222202 XER: 20040000
CFAR: c0000000003c1ed4 DAR: c000000400000000 DSISR: 42000000 IRQMASK: 0
GPR00: c0000000003c1ed8 c000000008a57a10 c0000000019da700 c000000400000000
GPR04: 0000000000000280 0000000000000180 0000000000000400 0000000000000200
GPR08: 0000000000000100 0000000000000080 0000000000000040 0000000000000300
GPR12: 0000000000000380 c000000001bc0000 c0000000001660c8 c000000006337e00
GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR20: 0000000040000000 0000000020000000 c000000001a81990 c000000008c30000
GPR24: c000000008c20000 c000000001a81998 000fffffffff0000 c000000001a819a0
GPR28: c000000001a81908 c00c000001000000 c000000008c40000 c000000008a64680
NIP clear_user_page+0x50/0x80
LR __handle_mm_fault+0xc88/0x1910
Call Trace:
__handle_mm_fault+0xc44/0x1910 (unreliable)
handle_mm_fault+0x130/0x2a0
__get_user_pages+0x248/0x610
__get_user_pages_remote+0x12c/0x3e0
get_arg_page+0x54/0xf0
copy_string_kernel+0x11c/0x210
kernel_execve+0x16c/0x220
call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x1b0/0x2f0
ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x70
Instruction dump:
79280fa4 79271764 79261f24 794ae8e2 7ca94214 7d683a14 7c893a14 7d893050
7d4903a6 60000000 60000000 60000000 <7c001fec> 7c091fec 7c081fec 7c051fec
---[ end trace 490b8c67e6075e09 ]---
Making for_each_mem_range() include MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG regions in the
traversal fixes this issue.
Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976100
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210712071132.20902-1-rppt@kernel.org
Fixes: b10d6bca8720 ("arch, drivers: replace for_each_membock() with for_each_mem_range()")
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Greg Kurz <groug@...d.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> [5.10+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
include/linux/memblock.h | 4 ++--
mm/memblock.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static inline void __next_physmem_range(
*/
#define for_each_mem_range(i, p_start, p_end) \
__for_each_mem_range(i, &memblock.memory, NULL, NUMA_NO_NODE, \
- MEMBLOCK_NONE, p_start, p_end, NULL)
+ MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG, p_start, p_end, NULL)
/**
* for_each_mem_range_rev - reverse iterate through memblock areas from
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static inline void __next_physmem_range(
*/
#define for_each_mem_range_rev(i, p_start, p_end) \
__for_each_mem_range_rev(i, &memblock.memory, NULL, NUMA_NO_NODE, \
- MEMBLOCK_NONE, p_start, p_end, NULL)
+ MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG, p_start, p_end, NULL)
/**
* for_each_reserved_mem_range - iterate over all reserved memblock areas
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -940,7 +940,8 @@ static bool should_skip_region(struct me
return true;
/* skip hotpluggable memory regions if needed */
- if (movable_node_is_enabled() && memblock_is_hotpluggable(m))
+ if (movable_node_is_enabled() && memblock_is_hotpluggable(m) &&
+ !(flags & MEMBLOCK_HOTPLUG))
return true;
/* if we want mirror memory skip non-mirror memory regions */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists