[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210726153846.727497218@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:36:46 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.13 014/223] bpf, samples: Fix xdpsock with -M parameter missing unload process
From: Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>
[ Upstream commit 2620e92ae6ed83260eb46d214554cd308ee35d92 ]
Execute the following command and exit, then execute it again, the following
error will be reported:
$ sudo ./samples/bpf/xdpsock -i ens4f2 -M
^C
$ sudo ./samples/bpf/xdpsock -i ens4f2 -M
libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(16) .eh_frame
libbpf: elf: skipping relo section(17) .rel.eh_frame for section(16) .eh_frame
libbpf: Kernel error message: XDP program already attached
ERROR: link set xdp fd failed
Commit c9d27c9e8dc7 ("samples: bpf: Do not unload prog within xdpsock") removed
the unloading prog code because of the presence of bpf_link. This is fine if
XDP_SHARED_UMEM is disabled, but if it is enabled, unloading the prog is still
needed.
Fixes: c9d27c9e8dc7 ("samples: bpf: Do not unload prog within xdpsock")
Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210628091815.2373487-1-wanghai38@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
index 53e300f860bb..33d0bdebbed8 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static int opt_xsk_frame_size = XSK_UMEM__DEFAULT_FRAME_SIZE;
static int opt_timeout = 1000;
static bool opt_need_wakeup = true;
static u32 opt_num_xsks = 1;
+static u32 prog_id;
static bool opt_busy_poll;
static bool opt_reduced_cap;
@@ -461,6 +462,23 @@ static void *poller(void *arg)
return NULL;
}
+static void remove_xdp_program(void)
+{
+ u32 curr_prog_id = 0;
+
+ if (bpf_get_link_xdp_id(opt_ifindex, &curr_prog_id, opt_xdp_flags)) {
+ printf("bpf_get_link_xdp_id failed\n");
+ exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+ }
+
+ if (prog_id == curr_prog_id)
+ bpf_set_link_xdp_fd(opt_ifindex, -1, opt_xdp_flags);
+ else if (!curr_prog_id)
+ printf("couldn't find a prog id on a given interface\n");
+ else
+ printf("program on interface changed, not removing\n");
+}
+
static void int_exit(int sig)
{
benchmark_done = true;
@@ -471,6 +489,9 @@ static void __exit_with_error(int error, const char *file, const char *func,
{
fprintf(stderr, "%s:%s:%i: errno: %d/\"%s\"\n", file, func,
line, error, strerror(error));
+
+ if (opt_num_xsks > 1)
+ remove_xdp_program();
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
@@ -490,6 +511,9 @@ static void xdpsock_cleanup(void)
if (write(sock, &cmd, sizeof(int)) < 0)
exit_with_error(errno);
}
+
+ if (opt_num_xsks > 1)
+ remove_xdp_program();
}
static void swap_mac_addresses(void *data)
@@ -857,6 +881,10 @@ static struct xsk_socket_info *xsk_configure_socket(struct xsk_umem_info *umem,
if (ret)
exit_with_error(-ret);
+ ret = bpf_get_link_xdp_id(opt_ifindex, &prog_id, opt_xdp_flags);
+ if (ret)
+ exit_with_error(-ret);
+
xsk->app_stats.rx_empty_polls = 0;
xsk->app_stats.fill_fail_polls = 0;
xsk->app_stats.copy_tx_sendtos = 0;
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists