linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.13 000/223] 5.13.6-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <99b34fe9-0f1f-c94f-58d5-cfb43de98d76@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 11:43:10 -0500
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     shuah@...nel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, pavel@...x.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.13 000/223] 5.13.6-rc1 review

Hello!

On 7/26/21 10:36 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.13.6 release.
> There are 223 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 28 Jul 2021 15:38:12 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.13.6-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.13.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Build regressions detected across plenty of architectures and configurations:

   /builds/linux/net/core/dev.c: In function 'gro_list_prepare':
   /builds/linux/net/core/dev.c:5988:72: error: 'TC_SKB_EXT' undeclared (first use in this function)
    5988 |                         struct tc_skb_ext *skb_ext = skb_ext_find(skb, TC_SKB_EXT);
         |                                                                        ^~~~~~~~~~
   /builds/linux/net/core/dev.c:5988:72: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
   /builds/linux/net/core/dev.c:5993:47: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct tc_skb_ext'
    5993 |                                 diffs |= p_ext->chain ^ skb_ext->chain;
         |                                               ^~
   /builds/linux/net/core/dev.c:5993:64: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct tc_skb_ext'
    5993 |                                 diffs |= p_ext->chain ^ skb_ext->chain;
         |                                                                ^~
   make[3]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:273: net/core/dev.o] Error 1
   make[3]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
   make[2]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:516: net/core] Error 2
   make[2]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
   make[1]: *** [/builds/linux/Makefile:1853: net] Error 2
   make[1]: Target '__all' not remade because of errors.
   make: *** [Makefile:220: __sub-make] Error 2


Here's a summary:
* arc: 10 total, 4 passed, 6 failed
* arm: 193 total, 18 passed, 175 failed
* arm64: 27 total, 12 passed, 15 failed
* dragonboard-410c: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed
* hi6220-hikey: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed
* i386: 26 total, 12 passed, 14 failed
* mips: 45 total, 15 passed, 30 failed
* parisc: 9 total, 6 passed, 3 failed
* powerpc: 27 total, 6 passed, 21 failed
* riscv: 21 total, 14 passed, 7 failed
* s390: 18 total, 12 passed, 6 failed
* sh: 18 total, 6 passed, 12 failed
* sparc: 9 total, 6 passed, 3 failed
* x15: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed
* x86: 1 total, 0 passed, 1 failed
* x86_64: 27 total, 12 passed, 15 failed

All failed, except allnoconfig, tinyconfig, and a few others here and there.

Same applies for 5.10.

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org