lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgqOZmRT_gmAS+K9sA7EYCKM9BYzvJMhy1_P6JaaVGvfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 10:15:31 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:     Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        cluster-devel <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] iov_iter: Introduce fault_in_iov_iter helper

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 9:33 AM Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> On Fri 23-07-21 22:58:34, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > +     gup_flags = FOLL_TOUCH | FOLL_POPULATE;
>
> I don't think FOLL_POPULATE makes sense here. It makes sense only with
> FOLL_MLOCK and determines whether mlock(2) should fault in missing pages or
> not.

Yeah, it won't hurt, but FOLL_POPULATE doesn't actually do anything
unless FOLL_MLOCK is set. It is, as you say, a magic flag just for
mlock.

The only ones that should matter are FOLL_WRITE (for obvious reasons)
and FOLL_TOUCH (to set the accessed and dirty bits, rather than just
th protection bits)

                   Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ