linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] arm pl011 serial: support multi-irq request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 22:14:04 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@...cinc.com>, Bing Fan <hptsfb@...il.com>,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Bing Fan <tombinfan@...cent.com>
Cc:     linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] arm pl011 serial: support multi-irq request

On 2021-07-26 21:56, Qian Cai wrote:
> 
> 
> On 7/26/2021 4:36 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> The important point you're missing, but which the KASAN dump does hint at, is
>> that that is a machine with SBSA generic UARTs booting via ACPI - I know it
>> doesn't do DT at all because I have one too. What matters there is that pl011
>> binds as a platform driver, *not* an amba driver.
> 
> Thanks for pointing out, Robin. I just yet to see an ARM server booting from DT
> those days.

Unlikely in production datacentre/cloud environments, indeed, although 
some of the mid-range kit like LX2160 does start to blur the line of 
what might be considered "server", and that's one example which *does* 
have full-featured DT support (even if it also aspires to ACPI...)

What I thought was worth clarifying for the general audience is that the 
relevant aspects of "server" here should in fact still be possible to 
reproduce on something like a Raspberry Pi or a tiny QEMU VM, if one can 
figure out the ACPI runes :)

Thanks,
Robin.