lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210726220858.GO8018@packtop>
Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 22:08:59 +0000
From:   Zev Weiss <zweiss@...inix.com>
To:     Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@...el.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] hwmon: peci: Add dimmtemp driver

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 05:04:45PM CDT, Iwona Winiarska wrote:
>Add peci-dimmtemp driver for Digital Thermal Sensor (DTS) thermal
>readings of DIMMs that are accessible via the processor PECI interface.
>
>The main use case for the driver (and PECI interface) is out-of-band
>management, where we're able to obtain the DTS readings from an external
>entity connected with PECI, e.g. BMC on server platforms.
>
>Co-developed-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@...el.com>
>Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
>---
> drivers/hwmon/peci/Kconfig    |  13 +
> drivers/hwmon/peci/Makefile   |   2 +
> drivers/hwmon/peci/dimmtemp.c | 508 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 523 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/peci/dimmtemp.c
>
>diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/peci/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/peci/Kconfig
>index e10eed68d70a..f2d57efa508b 100644
>--- a/drivers/hwmon/peci/Kconfig
>+++ b/drivers/hwmon/peci/Kconfig
>@@ -14,5 +14,18 @@ config SENSORS_PECI_CPUTEMP
> 	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> 	  will be called peci-cputemp.
>
>+config SENSORS_PECI_DIMMTEMP
>+	tristate "PECI DIMM temperature monitoring client"
>+	depends on PECI
>+	select SENSORS_PECI
>+	select PECI_CPU
>+	help
>+	  If you say yes here you get support for the generic Intel PECI hwmon
>+	  driver which provides Digital Thermal Sensor (DTS) thermal readings of
>+	  DIMM components that are accessible via the processor PECI interface.
>+
>+	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
>+	  will be called peci-dimmtemp.
>+
> config SENSORS_PECI
> 	tristate
>diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/peci/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/peci/Makefile
>index e8a0ada5ab1f..191cfa0227f3 100644
>--- a/drivers/hwmon/peci/Makefile
>+++ b/drivers/hwmon/peci/Makefile
>@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>
> peci-cputemp-y := cputemp.o
>+peci-dimmtemp-y := dimmtemp.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PECI_CPUTEMP)	+= peci-cputemp.o
>+obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PECI_DIMMTEMP)	+= peci-dimmtemp.o
>diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/peci/dimmtemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/peci/dimmtemp.c
>new file mode 100644
>index 000000000000..2fcb8607137a
>--- /dev/null
>+++ b/drivers/hwmon/peci/dimmtemp.c
>@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
>+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>+// Copyright (c) 2018-2021 Intel Corporation
>+
>+#include <linux/auxiliary_bus.h>
>+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>+#include <linux/bitops.h>
>+#include <linux/hwmon.h>
>+#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>+#include <linux/module.h>
>+#include <linux/peci.h>
>+#include <linux/peci-cpu.h>
>+#include <linux/units.h>
>+#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>+#include <linux/x86/intel-family.h>
>+
>+#include "common.h"
>+
>+#define DIMM_MASK_CHECK_DELAY_JIFFIES	msecs_to_jiffies(5000)
>+#define DIMM_MASK_CHECK_RETRY_MAX	60 /* 60 x 5 secs = 5 minutes */
>+
>+/* Max number of channel ranks and DIMM index per channel */
>+#define CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_HSX	8
>+#define DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_HSX	3
>+#define CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_BDX	4
>+#define DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_BDX	3
>+#define CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_BDXD	2
>+#define DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_BDXD	2
>+#define CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_SKX	6
>+#define DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_SKX	2
>+#define CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_ICX	8
>+#define DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_ICX	2
>+#define CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_ICXD	4
>+#define DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_ICXD	2
>+
>+#define CHAN_RANK_MAX		CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_HSX
>+#define DIMM_IDX_MAX		DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_HSX
>+#define DIMM_NUMS_MAX		(CHAN_RANK_MAX * DIMM_IDX_MAX)

Should we perhaps have a static_assert(DIMM_NUMS_MAX <= 64) so that
check_populated_dimms() doesn't silently break if we ever have a system
with > 64 dimms?  (Not sure how far off that might be, but doesn't seem
*that* wildly inconceivable, anyway.)

On a similar note, it'd be nice if there were some neat way of
automating the maintenance of CHAN_RANK_MAX and DIMM_IDX_MAX, but I
don't know of any great solutions for that offhand.  (Shrug.)

>+
>+#define CPU_SEG_MASK		GENMASK(23, 16)
>+#define GET_CPU_SEG(x)		(((x) & CPU_SEG_MASK) >> 16)
>+#define CPU_BUS_MASK		GENMASK(7, 0)
>+#define GET_CPU_BUS(x)		((x) & CPU_BUS_MASK)
>+
>+#define DIMM_TEMP_MAX		GENMASK(15, 8)
>+#define DIMM_TEMP_CRIT		GENMASK(23, 16)
>+#define GET_TEMP_MAX(x)		(((x) & DIMM_TEMP_MAX) >> 8)
>+#define GET_TEMP_CRIT(x)	(((x) & DIMM_TEMP_CRIT) >> 16)
>+
>+struct dimm_info {
>+	int chan_rank_max;
>+	int dimm_idx_max;
>+	u8 min_peci_revision;

This field doesn't seem to be used for anything that I can see; is it
really needed?

>+};
>+
>+struct peci_dimmtemp {
>+	struct peci_device *peci_dev;
>+	struct device *dev;
>+	const char *name;
>+	const struct dimm_info *gen_info;
>+	struct delayed_work detect_work;
>+	struct peci_sensor_data temp[DIMM_NUMS_MAX];
>+	long temp_max[DIMM_NUMS_MAX];
>+	long temp_crit[DIMM_NUMS_MAX];
>+	int retry_count;
>+	char **dimmtemp_label;
>+	DECLARE_BITMAP(dimm_mask, DIMM_NUMS_MAX);
>+};
>+
>+static u8 __dimm_temp(u32 reg, int dimm_order)
>+{
>+	return (reg >> (dimm_order * 8)) & 0xff;
>+}
>+
>+static int get_dimm_temp(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv, int dimm_no)
>+{
>+	int dimm_order = dimm_no % priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
>+	int chan_rank = dimm_no / priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
>+	struct peci_device *peci_dev = priv->peci_dev;
>+	u8 cpu_seg, cpu_bus, dev, func;
>+	u64 offset;
>+	u32 data;
>+	u16 reg;
>+	int ret;
>+
>+	if (!peci_sensor_need_update(&priv->temp[dimm_no]))
>+		return 0;
>+
>+	ret = peci_pcs_read(peci_dev, PECI_PCS_DDR_DIMM_TEMP, chan_rank, &data);
>+	if (ret)
>+		return ret;
>+
>+	priv->temp[dimm_no].value = __dimm_temp(data, dimm_order) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
>+
>+	switch (peci_dev->info.model) {
>+	case INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_X:
>+	case INTEL_FAM6_ICELAKE_D:
>+		ret = peci_ep_pci_local_read(peci_dev, 0, 13, 0, 2, 0xd4, &data);
>+		if (ret || !(data & BIT(31)))
>+			break; /* Use default or previous value */
>+
>+		ret = peci_ep_pci_local_read(peci_dev, 0, 13, 0, 2, 0xd0, &data);
>+		if (ret)
>+			break; /* Use default or previous value */
>+
>+		cpu_seg = GET_CPU_SEG(data);
>+		cpu_bus = GET_CPU_BUS(data);
>+
>+		/*
>+		 * Device 26, Offset 224e0: IMC 0 channel 0 -> rank 0
>+		 * Device 26, Offset 264e0: IMC 0 channel 1 -> rank 1
>+		 * Device 27, Offset 224e0: IMC 1 channel 0 -> rank 2
>+		 * Device 27, Offset 264e0: IMC 1 channel 1 -> rank 3
>+		 * Device 28, Offset 224e0: IMC 2 channel 0 -> rank 4
>+		 * Device 28, Offset 264e0: IMC 2 channel 1 -> rank 5
>+		 * Device 29, Offset 224e0: IMC 3 channel 0 -> rank 6
>+		 * Device 29, Offset 264e0: IMC 3 channel 1 -> rank 7
>+		 */
>+		dev = 0x1a + chan_rank / 2;
>+		offset = 0x224e0 + dimm_order * 4;
>+		if (chan_rank % 2)
>+			offset += 0x4000;
>+
>+		ret = peci_mmio_read(peci_dev, 0, cpu_seg, cpu_bus, dev, 0, offset, &data);
>+		if (ret)
>+			return ret;
>+
>+		priv->temp_max[dimm_no] = GET_TEMP_MAX(data) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
>+		priv->temp_crit[dimm_no] = GET_TEMP_CRIT(data) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;

These two lines look identical in all (non-default) cases; should we
deduplicate them by just moving them to after the switch?

>+
>+		break;
>+	case INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X:
>+		/*
>+		 * Device 10, Function 2: IMC 0 channel 0 -> rank 0
>+		 * Device 10, Function 6: IMC 0 channel 1 -> rank 1
>+		 * Device 11, Function 2: IMC 0 channel 2 -> rank 2
>+		 * Device 12, Function 2: IMC 1 channel 0 -> rank 3
>+		 * Device 12, Function 6: IMC 1 channel 1 -> rank 4
>+		 * Device 13, Function 2: IMC 1 channel 2 -> rank 5
>+		 */
>+		dev = 10 + chan_rank / 3 * 2 + (chan_rank % 3 == 2 ? 1 : 0);
>+		func = chan_rank % 3 == 1 ? 6 : 2;
>+		reg = 0x120 + dimm_order * 4;
>+
>+		ret = peci_pci_local_read(peci_dev, 2, dev, func, reg, &data);
>+		if (ret)
>+			return ret;
>+
>+		priv->temp_max[dimm_no] = GET_TEMP_MAX(data) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
>+		priv->temp_crit[dimm_no] = GET_TEMP_CRIT(data) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
>+
>+		break;
>+	case INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_D:
>+		/*
>+		 * Device 10, Function 2: IMC 0 channel 0 -> rank 0
>+		 * Device 10, Function 6: IMC 0 channel 1 -> rank 1
>+		 * Device 12, Function 2: IMC 1 channel 0 -> rank 2
>+		 * Device 12, Function 6: IMC 1 channel 1 -> rank 3
>+		 */
>+		dev = 10 + chan_rank / 2 * 2;
>+		func = (chan_rank % 2) ? 6 : 2;
>+		reg = 0x120 + dimm_order * 4;
>+
>+		ret = peci_pci_local_read(peci_dev, 2, dev, func, reg, &data);
>+		if (ret)
>+			return ret;
>+
>+		priv->temp_max[dimm_no] = GET_TEMP_MAX(data) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
>+		priv->temp_crit[dimm_no] = GET_TEMP_CRIT(data) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
>+
>+		break;
>+	case INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_X:
>+	case INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_X:
>+		/*
>+		 * Device 20, Function 0: IMC 0 channel 0 -> rank 0
>+		 * Device 20, Function 1: IMC 0 channel 1 -> rank 1
>+		 * Device 21, Function 0: IMC 0 channel 2 -> rank 2
>+		 * Device 21, Function 1: IMC 0 channel 3 -> rank 3
>+		 * Device 23, Function 0: IMC 1 channel 0 -> rank 4
>+		 * Device 23, Function 1: IMC 1 channel 1 -> rank 5
>+		 * Device 24, Function 0: IMC 1 channel 2 -> rank 6
>+		 * Device 24, Function 1: IMC 1 channel 3 -> rank 7
>+		 */
>+		dev = 20 + chan_rank / 2 + chan_rank / 4;
>+		func = chan_rank % 2;
>+		reg = 0x120 + dimm_order * 4;
>+
>+		ret = peci_pci_local_read(peci_dev, 1, dev, func, reg, &data);
>+		if (ret)
>+			return ret;
>+
>+		priv->temp_max[dimm_no] = GET_TEMP_MAX(data) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
>+		priv->temp_crit[dimm_no] = GET_TEMP_CRIT(data) * MILLIDEGREE_PER_DEGREE;
>+
>+		break;
>+	default:
>+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+	}
>+
>+	peci_sensor_mark_updated(&priv->temp[dimm_no]);
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int dimmtemp_read_string(struct device *dev,
>+				enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
>+				u32 attr, int channel, const char **str)
>+{
>+	struct peci_dimmtemp *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>+
>+	if (attr != hwmon_temp_label)
>+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+
>+	*str = (const char *)priv->dimmtemp_label[channel];
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int dimmtemp_read(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
>+			 u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
>+{
>+	struct peci_dimmtemp *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>+	int ret;
>+
>+	ret = get_dimm_temp(priv, channel);
>+	if (ret)
>+		return ret;
>+
>+	switch (attr) {
>+	case hwmon_temp_input:
>+		*val = priv->temp[channel].value;
>+		break;
>+	case hwmon_temp_max:
>+		*val = priv->temp_max[channel];
>+		break;
>+	case hwmon_temp_crit:
>+		*val = priv->temp_crit[channel];
>+		break;
>+	default:
>+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+	}
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static umode_t dimmtemp_is_visible(const void *data, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
>+				   u32 attr, int channel)
>+{
>+	const struct peci_dimmtemp *priv = data;
>+
>+	if (test_bit(channel, priv->dimm_mask))
>+		return 0444;
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static const struct hwmon_ops peci_dimmtemp_ops = {
>+	.is_visible = dimmtemp_is_visible,
>+	.read_string = dimmtemp_read_string,
>+	.read = dimmtemp_read,
>+};
>+
>+static int check_populated_dimms(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv)
>+{
>+	int chan_rank_max = priv->gen_info->chan_rank_max;
>+	int dimm_idx_max = priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
>+	int chan_rank, dimm_idx, ret;
>+	u64 dimm_mask = 0;
>+	u32 pcs;
>+
>+	for (chan_rank = 0; chan_rank < chan_rank_max; chan_rank++) {
>+		ret = peci_pcs_read(priv->peci_dev, PECI_PCS_DDR_DIMM_TEMP, chan_rank, &pcs);
>+		if (ret) {
>+			/*
>+			 * Overall, we expect either success or -EINVAL in
>+			 * order to determine whether DIMM is populated or not.
>+			 * For anything else - we fall back to defering the
>+			 * detection to be performed at a later point in time.
>+			 */
>+			if (ret == -EINVAL)
>+				continue;
>+			else
>+				return -EAGAIN;
>+		}
>+
>+		for (dimm_idx = 0; dimm_idx < dimm_idx_max; dimm_idx++)
>+			if (__dimm_temp(pcs, dimm_idx))
>+				dimm_mask |= BIT(chan_rank * dimm_idx_max + dimm_idx);
>+	}
>+	/*
>+	 * It's possible that memory training is not done yet. In this case we
>+	 * defer the detection to be performed at a later point in time.
>+	 */
>+	if (!dimm_mask)
>+		return -EAGAIN;
>+
>+	dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Scanned populated DIMMs: %#llx\n", dimm_mask);

Hmm, though aside from this one debug print it seems like this function
could just as easily operate directly on priv->dimm_mask if we wanted to
make it safe for >64 dimms (I have no particular objection to keeping it
as-is for now though).

>+
>+	bitmap_from_u64(priv->dimm_mask, dimm_mask);
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static int create_dimm_temp_label(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv, int chan)
>+{
>+	int rank = chan / priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
>+	int idx = chan % priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
>+
>+	priv->dimmtemp_label[chan] = devm_kasprintf(priv->dev, GFP_KERNEL,
>+						    "DIMM %c%d", 'A' + rank,
>+						    idx + 1);
>+	if (!priv->dimmtemp_label[chan])
>+		return -ENOMEM;
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static const u32 peci_dimmtemp_temp_channel_config[] = {
>+	[0 ... DIMM_NUMS_MAX - 1] = HWMON_T_LABEL | HWMON_T_INPUT | HWMON_T_MAX | HWMON_T_CRIT,
>+	0
>+};
>+
>+static const struct hwmon_channel_info peci_dimmtemp_temp_channel = {
>+	.type = hwmon_temp,
>+	.config = peci_dimmtemp_temp_channel_config,
>+};
>+
>+static const struct hwmon_channel_info *peci_dimmtemp_temp_info[] = {
>+	&peci_dimmtemp_temp_channel,
>+	NULL
>+};
>+
>+static const struct hwmon_chip_info peci_dimmtemp_chip_info = {
>+	.ops = &peci_dimmtemp_ops,
>+	.info = peci_dimmtemp_temp_info,
>+};
>+
>+static int create_dimm_temp_info(struct peci_dimmtemp *priv)
>+{
>+	int ret, i, channels;
>+	struct device *dev;
>+
>+	ret = check_populated_dimms(priv);
>+	if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
>+		if (priv->retry_count < DIMM_MASK_CHECK_RETRY_MAX) {
>+			schedule_delayed_work(&priv->detect_work,
>+					      DIMM_MASK_CHECK_DELAY_JIFFIES);
>+			priv->retry_count++;
>+			dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Deferred populating DIMM temp info\n");
>+			return ret;
>+		}
>+
>+		dev_info(priv->dev, "Timeout populating DIMM temp info\n");
>+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
>+	}
>+
>+	channels = priv->gen_info->chan_rank_max * priv->gen_info->dimm_idx_max;
>+
>+	priv->dimmtemp_label = devm_kzalloc(priv->dev, channels * sizeof(char *), GFP_KERNEL);
>+	if (!priv->dimmtemp_label)
>+		return -ENOMEM;
>+
>+	for_each_set_bit(i, priv->dimm_mask, DIMM_NUMS_MAX) {
>+		ret = create_dimm_temp_label(priv, i);
>+		if (ret)
>+			return ret;
>+	}
>+
>+	dev = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(priv->dev, priv->name, priv,
>+						   &peci_dimmtemp_chip_info, NULL);
>+	if (IS_ERR(dev)) {
>+		dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to register hwmon device\n");
>+		return PTR_ERR(dev);
>+	}
>+
>+	dev_dbg(priv->dev, "%s: sensor '%s'\n", dev_name(dev), priv->name);
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static void create_dimm_temp_info_delayed(struct work_struct *work)
>+{
>+	struct peci_dimmtemp *priv = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
>+						  struct peci_dimmtemp,
>+						  detect_work);
>+	int ret;
>+
>+	ret = create_dimm_temp_info(priv);
>+	if (ret && ret != -EAGAIN)
>+		dev_dbg(priv->dev, "Failed to populate DIMM temp info\n");
>+}
>+
>+static int peci_dimmtemp_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev, const struct auxiliary_device_id *id)
>+{
>+	struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
>+	struct peci_device *peci_dev = to_peci_device(dev->parent);
>+	struct peci_dimmtemp *priv;
>+	int ret;
>+
>+	priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>+	if (!priv)
>+		return -ENOMEM;
>+
>+	priv->name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "peci_dimmtemp.cpu%d",
>+				    peci_dev->info.socket_id);
>+	if (!priv->name)
>+		return -ENOMEM;
>+
>+	dev_set_drvdata(dev, priv);
>+	priv->dev = dev;
>+	priv->peci_dev = peci_dev;
>+	priv->gen_info = (const struct dimm_info *)id->driver_data;
>+
>+	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&priv->detect_work, create_dimm_temp_info_delayed);
>+
>+	ret = create_dimm_temp_info(priv);
>+	if (ret && ret != -EAGAIN) {
>+		dev_dbg(dev, "Failed to populate DIMM temp info\n");
>+		return ret;
>+	}
>+
>+	return 0;
>+}
>+
>+static void peci_dimmtemp_remove(struct auxiliary_device *adev)
>+{
>+	struct peci_dimmtemp *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&adev->dev);
>+
>+	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&priv->detect_work);
>+}
>+
>+static const struct dimm_info dimm_hsx = {
>+	.chan_rank_max	= CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_HSX,
>+	.dimm_idx_max	= DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_HSX,
>+	.min_peci_revision = 0x30,
>+};
>+
>+static const struct dimm_info dimm_bdx = {
>+	.chan_rank_max	= CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_BDX,
>+	.dimm_idx_max	= DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_BDX,
>+	.min_peci_revision = 0x30,
>+};
>+
>+static const struct dimm_info dimm_bdxd = {
>+	.chan_rank_max	= CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_BDXD,
>+	.dimm_idx_max	= DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_BDXD,
>+	.min_peci_revision = 0x30,
>+};
>+
>+static const struct dimm_info dimm_skx = {
>+	.chan_rank_max	= CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_SKX,
>+	.dimm_idx_max	= DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_SKX,
>+	.min_peci_revision = 0x30,
>+};
>+
>+static const struct dimm_info dimm_icx = {
>+	.chan_rank_max	= CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_ICX,
>+	.dimm_idx_max	= DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_ICX,
>+	.min_peci_revision = 0x40,
>+};
>+
>+static const struct dimm_info dimm_icxd = {
>+	.chan_rank_max	= CHAN_RANK_MAX_ON_ICXD,
>+	.dimm_idx_max	= DIMM_IDX_MAX_ON_ICXD,
>+	.min_peci_revision = 0x40,
>+};
>+
>+static const struct auxiliary_device_id peci_dimmtemp_ids[] = {
>+	{
>+		.name = "peci_cpu.dimmtemp.hsx",
>+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&dimm_hsx,
>+	},
>+	{
>+		.name = "peci_cpu.dimmtemp.bdx",
>+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&dimm_bdx,
>+	},
>+	{
>+		.name = "peci_cpu.dimmtemp.bdxd",
>+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&dimm_bdxd,
>+	},
>+	{
>+		.name = "peci_cpu.dimmtemp.skx",
>+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&dimm_skx,
>+	},
>+	{
>+		.name = "peci_cpu.dimmtemp.icx",
>+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&dimm_icx,
>+	},
>+	{
>+		.name = "peci_cpu.dimmtemp.icxd",
>+		.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&dimm_icxd,
>+	},
>+	{ }
>+};
>+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(auxiliary, peci_dimmtemp_ids);
>+
>+static struct auxiliary_driver peci_dimmtemp_driver = {
>+	.probe		= peci_dimmtemp_probe,
>+	.remove		= peci_dimmtemp_remove,
>+	.id_table	= peci_dimmtemp_ids,
>+};
>+
>+module_auxiliary_driver(peci_dimmtemp_driver);
>+
>+MODULE_AUTHOR("Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@...ux.intel.com>");
>+MODULE_AUTHOR("Iwona Winiarska <iwona.winiarska@...el.com>");
>+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("PECI dimmtemp driver");
>+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>+MODULE_IMPORT_NS(PECI_CPU);
>-- 
>2.31.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ