[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <832b7db0-4eb2-9151-c2b3-db709aee3230@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 19:31:30 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, joro@...tes.org,
will@...nel.org
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, john.garry@...wei.com,
dianders@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/23] iommu: Express DMA strictness via the domain type
On 2021/7/26 16:27, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-07-24 06:29, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> Hi Robin,
>>
>> On 2021/7/22 2:20, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> Eliminate the iommu_get_dma_strict() indirection and pipe the
>>> information through the domain type from the beginning. Besides
>>> the flow simplification this also has several nice side-effects:
>>>
>>> - Automatically implies strict mode for untrusted devices by
>>> virtue of their IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA override.
>>> - Ensures that we only ends up using flush queues for drivers
>>> which are aware of them and can actually benefit.
>>
>> Is this expressed by vendor iommu driver has ops->flush_iotlb_all?
>
> No, it's literally whether ->domain_alloc accepts the DMA_DOMAIN_FQ type
> or not.
Get it. Thank you!
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists