[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a28699c3-d557-2c8f-f79e-c97a5cdb9035@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:09:53 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: nSVM: Rename nested_svm_vmloadsave() to
svm_copy_vmloadsave_state()
On 16/07/21 19:01, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
>> index 3bd09c50c98b..8493592b63b4 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
>> @@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ void svm_copy_vmrun_state(struct vmcb_save_area *from_save,
>> to_save->cpl = 0;
>> }
>>
>> -void nested_svm_vmloadsave(struct vmcb *from_vmcb, struct vmcb *to_vmcb)
>> +void svm_copy_vmloadsave_state(struct vmcb *from_vmcb, struct vmcb *to_vmcb)
>
> And swap the parameter order for both functions in a follow-up patch? I.e. have
> the destination first to match memcpy().
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists