linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/6] posix-cpu-timers: Consolidate timer base accessor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 14:55:12 +0200
From:   Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] posix-cpu-timers: Consolidate timer base accessor

Remove the ad-hoc timer base accessors and provide a consolidated one.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
 kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c | 28 +++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 4fbbbc89ac4a..0d918117a3e0 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -407,6 +407,17 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_create(struct k_itimer *new_timer)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static struct posix_cputimer_base *timer_base(struct k_itimer *timer,
+					      struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	int clkidx = CPUCLOCK_WHICH(timer->it_clock);
+
+	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
+		return tsk->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
+	else
+		return tsk->signal->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
+}
+
 /*
  * Dequeue the timer and reset the base if it was its earliest expiration.
  * It makes sure the next tick recalculates the base next expiration so we
@@ -421,18 +432,11 @@ static void disarm_timer(struct k_itimer *timer, struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	struct cpu_timer *ctmr = &timer->it.cpu;
 	struct posix_cputimer_base *base;
-	int clkidx;
 
 	if (!cpu_timer_dequeue(ctmr))
 		return;
 
-	clkidx = CPUCLOCK_WHICH(timer->it_clock);
-
-	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
-		base = p->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
-	else
-		base = p->signal->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
-
+	base = timer_base(timer, p);
 	if (cpu_timer_getexpires(ctmr) == base->nextevt)
 		base->nextevt = 0;
 }
@@ -531,15 +535,9 @@ void posix_cpu_timers_exit_group(struct task_struct *tsk)
  */
 static void arm_timer(struct k_itimer *timer, struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	int clkidx = CPUCLOCK_WHICH(timer->it_clock);
+	struct posix_cputimer_base *base = timer_base(timer, p);
 	struct cpu_timer *ctmr = &timer->it.cpu;
 	u64 newexp = cpu_timer_getexpires(ctmr);
-	struct posix_cputimer_base *base;
-
-	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
-		base = p->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
-	else
-		base = p->signal->posix_cputimers.bases + clkidx;
 
 	if (!cpu_timer_enqueue(&base->tqhead, ctmr))
 		return;
-- 
2.25.1