linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] *** staging: sm750fb: Rename maxH and maxW to max_h and max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <cover.1627304144.git.benjamin.philip495@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 18:45:00 +0530
From:   Benjamin Philip <benjamin.philip495@...il.com>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
        Teddy Wang <teddy.wang@...iconmotion.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Philip <benjamin.philip495@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] *** staging: sm750fb: Rename maxH and maxW to max_h and max_w ***

This patchset (as the subject implies) renames some struct members to follow the
snake_case naming convention from CamelCase. By doing so, it also fixes 2
checkpatch CHECKs.

To test it, I have only checked if the module builds, which it does.

Note: I am very new to the Linux Kernel. This is my first patch. I have done my best
to ensure that my patch is upto the expected standard and to research on what it is
expected by maintainers. Please forgive me if I have done something wrong.

Thanks,
Benjamin Philip

Benjamin Philip (2):
  staging: sm750fb: Rename maxH to max_h in lynx_cursor
  staging: sm750fb: Rename maxW to max_w in lynx_cursor

 drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c        | 8 ++++----
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h        | 4 ++--
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_cursor.c | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1