linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] watchdog: iTCO_wdt: Fix detection of SMI-off case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 26 Jul 2021 16:40:46 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Cc:     Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Christian Storm <christian.storm@...mens.com>,
        Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: iTCO_wdt: Fix detection of SMI-off case

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:04 PM Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
>
> On 26.07.21 14:01, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 2:46 PM Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
> >>
> >> Obviously, the test needs to run against the register content, not its
> >> address.
> >>
> >> Fixes: cb011044e34c ("watchdog: iTCO_wdt: Account for rebooting on second timeout")
> >> Reported-by: Mantas Mikulėnas <grawity@...il.com>
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
> >
> > Missed SoB of the submitter (hint: configure your Git to make sure
> > that submitter and author are the same in terms of name-email).
>
> The signed off is there. Not sure what you are referring to.

Nope. It's not. The sign of that is the From: line in the body of the
email. It happens when the submitter != author. And SoB of the former
one is absent. But what is strange is that reading them here I haven't
found the difference. Maybe one is in UTF-8 while the other is not and
a unicode character degraded to Latin-1 or so?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko