[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff6fc8d4-38e9-86ea-f689-609668c53196@kali.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:43:49 -0500
From: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@...i.org>
To: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>, agross@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: tdas@...eaurora.org, mka@...omium.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 0/6] Introduce LMh driver for Qualcomm SoCs
On 7/27/21 10:29 AM, Thara Gopinath wrote:
>
>
> On 7/21/21 11:14 PM, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> Hi Thara!
>>
>> On 7/8/21 7:06 AM, Thara Gopinath wrote:
>>> Limits Management Hardware(LMh) is a hardware infrastructure on some
>>> Qualcomm SoCs that can enforce temperature and current limits as
>>> programmed
>>> by software for certain IPs like CPU. On many newer SoCs LMh is
>>> configured
>>> by firmware/TZ and no programming is needed from the kernel side.
>>> But on
>>> certain SoCs like sdm845 the firmware does not do a complete
>>> programming of
>>> the h/w block. On such SoCs kernel software has to explicitly set up
>>> the
>>> temperature limits and turn on various monitoring and enforcing
>>> algorithms
>>> on the hardware.
>>>
>>> Introduce support for enabling and programming various limit
>>> settings and
>>> monitoring capabilities of Limits Management Hardware(LMh)
>>> associated with
>>> cpu clusters. Also introduce support in cpufreq hardware driver to
>>> monitor
>>> the interrupt associated with cpu frequency throttling so that this
>>> information can be conveyed to the schdeuler via thermal pressure
>>> interface.
>>>
>>> With this patch series following cpu performance improvement(30-70%) is
>>> observed on sdm845. The reasoning here is that without LMh being
>>> programmed
>>> properly from the kernel, the default settings were enabling thermal
>>> mitigation for CPUs at too low a temperature (around 70-75 degree
>>> C). This
>>> in turn meant that many a time CPUs were never actually allowed to
>>> hit the
>>> maximum possible/required frequencies.
>>>
>>> UnixBench whets and dhry (./Run whets dhry)
>>> System Benchmarks Index Score
>>>
>>> Without LMh Support With LMh Support
>>> 1 copy test 1353.7 1773.2
>>>
>>> 8 copy tests 4473.6 7402.3
>>>
>>> Sysbench cpu
>>> sysbench cpu --threads=8 --time=60 --cpu-max-prime=100000 run
>>>
>>> Without LMh Support With LMh Support
>>> Events per
>>> second 355 614
>>>
>>> Avg Latency(ms) 21.84 13.02
>>>
>>> v2->v3:
>>> - Included patch adding dt binding documentation for LMh nodes.
>>> - Rebased to v5.13
>>>
>>> Thara Gopinath (6):
>>> firmware: qcom_scm: Introduce SCM calls to access LMh
>>> thermal: qcom: Add support for LMh driver
>>> cpufreq: qcom-cpufreq-hw: Add dcvs interrupt support
>>> arm64: boot: dts: qcom: sdm45: Add support for LMh node
>>> arm64: boot: dts: qcom: sdm845: Remove cpufreq cooling devices
>>> for CPU
>>> thermal zones
>>> dt-bindings: thermal: Add dt binding for QCOM LMh
>>>
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-lmh.yaml | 100 ++++++++
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 162 ++----------
>>> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 118 +++++++++
>>> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 58 +++++
>>> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.h | 4 +
>>> drivers/thermal/qcom/Kconfig | 10 +
>>> drivers/thermal/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
>>> drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c | 239
>>> ++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/qcom_scm.h | 14 +
>>> 9 files changed, 570 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>>> create mode 100644
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-lmh.yaml
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
>>>
>> I've been using these patches on a 5.13 kernel
>> (https://github.com/steev/linux/tree/linux-5.13.y - while trying to
>> track down a different issue, while playing a video on youtube, as well
>> as compressing a 9.2GB file with xz, I got the following
>
> Hi Steev,
>
> Thanks for testing this. I was unable to reproduce this. I have posted
> v4 moving the interrupt handling in qcom-cpufreq-hw to threaded
> interrupt handler and hopefully this should fix the issue. It will be
> great if you can test and let me know.
>
Hi Thara,
I've been testing v4 for a little bit here, and so far I can't seem to
get it to reproduce anymore. I will keep trying but fingers crossed
that that did the trick.
For setup, I'm using https://github.com/steev/linux/tree/linux-5.13.y
with the "distro_defconfig" configuration here on my c630s. I'm also
running https://github.com/steev/scheduler as a systemd service. So far
I've been able to sleep/suspend without issue while running "make
-j$(nproc) deb-pkg" in those kernel sources as well as `xz
--memlimit-compress=50 -T 4 imagefile.img" on a 9.2GB file at the same
time. One system is running the Budgie desktop on top of Xorg, and the
other is running Gnome 3.38 on top of Wayland.
-- steev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists