[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGG=3QXbnK7q2JOkXre5iZLjK3DLUgb0ACaQCZsr1_98unumag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:12:13 -0700
From: Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] base: mark 'no_warn' as unused
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:32 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 7/27/2021 10:39 AM, 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built Linux wrote:
> > Isn't -Wunused-but-set-variable enabled only for W=1 builds?
>
> Maybe Bill's tree does not have commit 885480b08469 ("Makefile: Move
> -Wno-unused-but-set-variable out of GCC only block"), which disables the
> warning for clang just like GCC for regular builds?
>
Ah! I don't have that. It would technically make this patch
unnecessary. Use that information as you see fit.
-bw
Powered by blists - more mailing lists