[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210727205855.411487-43-keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:58:33 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Keith Packard <keithpac@...zon.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH 42/64] net: qede: Use memset_after() for counters
In preparation for FORTIFY_SOURCE performing compile-time and run-time
field bounds checking for memset(), avoid intentionally writing across
neighboring fields.
Use memset_after() so memset() doesn't get confused about writing
beyond the destination member that is intended to be the starting point
of zeroing through the end of the struct.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
---
The old code seems to be doing the wrong thing: starting from not the
first member, but sized for the whole struct. Which is correct?
---
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
index 01ac1e93d27a..309dfe8c94fb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_main.c
@@ -2419,7 +2419,7 @@ static int qede_load(struct qede_dev *edev, enum qede_load_mode mode,
goto out;
err4:
qede_sync_free_irqs(edev);
- memset(&edev->int_info.msix_cnt, 0, sizeof(struct qed_int_info));
+ memset_after(&edev->int_info, 0, msix);
err3:
qede_napi_disable_remove(edev);
err2:
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists