lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:50:40 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
        Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 029/167] net: do not reuse skbuff allocated from
 skbuff_fclone_cache in the skb cache

On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 10:22:38AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > [ Upstream commit 28b34f01a73435a754956ebae826e728c03ffa38 ]
> 
> Mainline is significantly different here. Patch makes no sense in
> 5.10, as both branches of if are same.
> 
> Best regards,
> 								Pavel
> 
> > --- a/net/core/dev.c
> > +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> > @@ -6100,6 +6100,8 @@ static gro_result_t napi_skb_finish(struct napi_struct *napi,
> >  	case GRO_MERGED_FREE:
> >  		if (NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->free == NAPI_GRO_FREE_STOLEN_HEAD)
> >  			napi_skb_free_stolen_head(skb);
> > +		else if (skb->fclone != SKB_FCLONE_UNAVAILABLE)
> > +			__kfree_skb(skb);
> >  		else
> >  			__kfree_skb(skb);
> >  		break;
> 

You are right, I'll go drop this patch from the queue now, thanks.

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ