[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX=K4S3Yd_ybd5C3e40XefMf5kHs1tWs1+VKTgiWEWEDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:07:30 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] nubus: Simplify check in remove callback
Hi Finn,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 11:50 AM Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Apart from that, the compiler might already assume dev->driver being
> > non-NULL after to_nubus_driver(dev->driver) was called.
>
> I don't understand how a compiler can make that assumption. But then, I
> don't know why compilers do a lot of the things they do...
It is one of those recent optimizations people have been complaining
about. Once you have dereferenced a pointer, compilers may remove
all further NULL-checks, assuming they can't happen, as the code
would have crashed anyway before due to the dereference.
Good luck running on bare metal with RAM at zero ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists