lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YP/dEMeULqozIqZd@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:16:48 +0100
From:   Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
To:     Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        qais.yousef@....com, rickyiu@...gle.com, wvw@...gle.com,
        patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, xuewen.yan94@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] sched: Skip priority checks with
 SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS

On Monday 26 Jul 2021 at 14:56:10 (+0100), Quentin Perret wrote:
> On Thursday 22 Jul 2021 at 10:47:33 (+0200), Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> > (*) This changes the behaviour when setting uclamp values on a DL task.
> > 
> > Before uclamp values could be set but now, because of
> > 
> >   void __getparam_dl(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_attr *attr)
> >     ..
> >     attr->sched_flags = dl_se->flags
> > 
> > SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP gets overwritten and  __sched_setscheduler() bails in:
> > 
> >     if (unlikely(policy == p->policy)) {
> >       ...
> >       retval = 0;
> >       goto unlock;
> >     }
> >   change:
> > 
> > I.e. the:
> > 
> >       if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_UTIL_CLAMP)
> >         goto change;
> > 
> > can't trigger anymore.
> 
> Bah, as you said it doesn't seem to be a big deal, but clearly that was
> unintentional. Let me try and fix this.

While looking at this I found existing bugs in the area. Fixes are here:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210727101103.2729607-1-qperret@google.com/

And with the above series applied this patch should behave correctly
now.

Thanks,
Quentin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ