lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5622d120-1b89-6898-d091-8b4ceff6418@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:21:52 +1000 (AEST)
From:   Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
cc:     linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes

On Sun, 25 Jul 2021, Al Viro wrote:

> 
> 	The series is on top of 5.14-rc1; it lives in
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git #untested.m68k
> Individual patches in followups...
> 
> 	_Very_ lightly tested on aranym; no real hardware to test it on.
> Any help with review and testing would be very welcome.
> 

I can test this branch on a Motorola 68040 machine I have here. Can you 
advise how to get decent code coverage? Maybe there's a package out there 
with a signal-heavy test suite? Maybe I need a break point in a signal 
handler? Or perhaps just send ^C to a process running under strace?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ