linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 20:21:52 +1000 (AEST)
From:   Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
cc:     linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes

On Sun, 25 Jul 2021, Al Viro wrote:

> 
> 	The series is on top of 5.14-rc1; it lives in
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git #untested.m68k
> Individual patches in followups...
> 
> 	_Very_ lightly tested on aranym; no real hardware to test it on.
> Any help with review and testing would be very welcome.
> 

I can test this branch on a Motorola 68040 machine I have here. Can you 
advise how to get decent code coverage? Maybe there's a package out there 
with a signal-heavy test suite? Maybe I need a break point in a signal 
handler? Or perhaps just send ^C to a process running under strace?