linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf pmu: Fix alias matching

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <df5e5893-08ba-1fb5-b92a-921b32ed3b2f@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 11:32:55 +0100
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <mingo@...hat.com>, <acme@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <jolsa@...hat.com>, <namhyung@...nel.org>, <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, <irogers@...gle.com>
CC:     <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf pmu: Fix alias matching

On 21/07/2021 04:07, Jin, Yao wrote:
>>

Hi Arnaldo,

Can you kindly consider picking up this patch?

Thanks

>> Fixes: c47a5599eda3 ("perf tools: Fix pattern matching for same 
>> substring in different PMU type")
>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> @Jin Yao, please test for your scenarios
>>
> 
> For x86, the form uncore_pmu_{digits} or the uncore_pmu itself are 
> supported. We don't have more complex case such as the name in the form 
> aaa_bbbX_cccY. So my test didn't cover that complex form.
> 
> For my test, your patch works, thanks! :)

Can we take this as a tested-by?