lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210727111448.1443-1-broonie@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 27 Jul 2021 12:14:47 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zack Rusin <zackr@...are.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the drm-next tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h

between commit:

  ebc9ac7c3dfe ("drm/vmwgfx: Update device headers")

from the drm-next tree and commit:

  be4f77ac6884 ("drm/vmwgfx: Cleanup fifo mmio handling")

from the drm-misc tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h
index 356f82c26f59,5652d982b1ce..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ