[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <efd7ab16-ed45-0ab0-a123-4e8e45c100d0@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 07:52:20 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: sparc64-linux-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option
'-mxsave'
On 7/26/21 8:11 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
>>> sparc64-linux-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-mxsave'
Is there something else funky going on here? All of the "-mxsave" flags
that I can find are under checks for x86 builds, like:
ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_I386),1)
$(BINARIES_32): CFLAGS += -m32 -mxsave
..
I'm confused how we could have a sparc64 compiler (and only a sparc64
compiler) that would end up with "-mxsave" in CFLAGS.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists