[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210727031333.dozrxrjs4p5uzmrb@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 06:13:33 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][V2] security: keys: trusted: Fix memory leaks on
allocated blob
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 12:44:31PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> There are several error return paths that don't kfree the allocated
> blob, leading to memory leaks. Ensure blob is initialized to null as
> some of the error return paths in function tpm2_key_decode do not
> change blob. Add an error return path to kfree blob and use this on
> the current leaky returns.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Resource leak")
> Fixes: f2219745250f ("security: keys: trusted: use ASN.1 TPM2 key format for the blobs")
> Acked-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> ---
>
> V2: Add a couple more leaky return path fixes as noted by Sumit Garg
> Add the if (blob != payload->blob) check on the kfree as
> noted by Dan Carpenter
>
> ---
> security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c
> index 0165da386289..a2cfdfdf17fa 100644
> --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c
> +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c
> @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ static int tpm2_load_cmd(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> unsigned int private_len;
> unsigned int public_len;
> unsigned int blob_len;
> - u8 *blob, *pub;
> + u8 *blob = NULL, *pub;
> int rc;
> u32 attrs;
>
> @@ -378,22 +378,30 @@ static int tpm2_load_cmd(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> }
>
> /* new format carries keyhandle but old format doesn't */
> - if (!options->keyhandle)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (!options->keyhandle) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
> + }
>
> /* must be big enough for at least the two be16 size counts */
> - if (payload->blob_len < 4)
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (payload->blob_len < 4) {
> + rc = -EINVAL;
> + goto err;
> + }
>
> private_len = get_unaligned_be16(blob);
>
> /* must be big enough for following public_len */
> - if (private_len + 2 + 2 > (payload->blob_len))
> - return -E2BIG;
> + if (private_len + 2 + 2 > (payload->blob_len)) {
> + rc = -E2BIG;
> + goto err;
> + }
>
> public_len = get_unaligned_be16(blob + 2 + private_len);
> - if (private_len + 2 + public_len + 2 > payload->blob_len)
> - return -E2BIG;
> + if (private_len + 2 + public_len + 2 > payload->blob_len) {
> + rc = -E2BIG;
> + goto err;
> + }
>
> pub = blob + 2 + private_len + 2;
> /* key attributes are always at offset 4 */
> @@ -406,12 +414,14 @@ static int tpm2_load_cmd(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> payload->migratable = 1;
>
> blob_len = private_len + public_len + 4;
> - if (blob_len > payload->blob_len)
> - return -E2BIG;
> + if (blob_len > payload->blob_len) {
> + rc = -E2BIG;
> + goto err;
> + }
>
> rc = tpm_buf_init(&buf, TPM2_ST_SESSIONS, TPM2_CC_LOAD);
> if (rc)
> - return rc;
> + goto err;
>
> tpm_buf_append_u32(&buf, options->keyhandle);
> tpm2_buf_append_auth(&buf, TPM2_RS_PW,
> @@ -441,6 +451,11 @@ static int tpm2_load_cmd(struct tpm_chip *chip,
> rc = -EPERM;
>
> return rc;
> +
> +err:
> + if (blob != payload->blob)
> + kfree(blob);
> + return rc;
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
Just denoting that I saw this, so just response to my other email,
and I'll use this one.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists