[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210727161133.GY4670@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2021 17:11:33 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
vinod.koul@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tiwai@...e.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] soundwire/ASoC: abstract platform-dependent bases
On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 07:54:45PM +0800, Bard Liao wrote:
> shim base and alh base are platform-dependent. This series suggests
> to use variables for those bases. It allows us to use different bases
> for new platforms.
The ASoC bits look fine to me, what't eh plan for merging this? I can
apply to ASoC if people like, or should the Soundwire bits go via the
Soundwire tree?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists