[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjwZzi=Lqsre8C8C4YJiVQNdNnco7jkLq=ohePSPA9JCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:58:08 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: rcu@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 rcu 04/18] rcu: Weaken ->dynticks accesses and updates
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:37 AM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> +/*
> + * Increment the current CPU's rcu_data structure's ->dynticks field
> + * with ordering. Return the new value.
> + */
> +static noinstr unsigned long rcu_dynticks_inc(int incby)
> +{
> + return arch_atomic_add_return(incby, this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data.dynticks));
> +}
Maybe inline?
But more I reacted to how we sadly don't have percpu atomics. They'd
be fairly easy to add on x86, but I guess it's not a huge deal.
And hey, if this is pretty much the only place that would use them, I
guess that's not much of an issue.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists