[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQHAHmMmysBVpF+m@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 22:37:50 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Cc: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Liang Chen <cl@...k-chips.com>, Simon Xue <xxm@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3568-evb1-v10: add ethernet
support
> Generally all rockchip boards use this value instead of the rgmii_id,
> I imagine because it's more consistent to tune here than the hit or
> miss support of the phy drivers.
Most PHY drivers actually implement it correctly, since by default,
most systems get the PHY to do the delays.
But if most Rockchip boards do it this way, there is a lot to be said
for consistence, so this is fine by me.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists