[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1627446609-9064-4-git-send-email-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 12:30:03 +0800
From: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
To: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@...nel.org>
CC: <collinsd@...eaurora.org>, <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
<quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
Subject: [spmi-pmic-arb fixes and optimization patches V1 3/9] spmi: pmic-arb: check apid against limits before calling irq handler
From: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
Check that the apid for an SPMI interrupt falls between the
min_apid and max_apid that can be handled by the APPS processor
before invoking the per-apid interrupt handler:
periph_interrupt().
This avoids an access violation in rare cases where the status
bit is set for an interrupt that is not owned by the APPS
processor.
Signed-off-by: David Collins <collinsd@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@...cinc.com>
---
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index 4d7ad004..c4adc06 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -535,6 +535,12 @@ static void pmic_arb_chained_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
id = ffs(status) - 1;
status &= ~BIT(id);
apid = id + i * 32;
+ if (apid < pmic_arb->min_apid
+ || apid > pmic_arb->max_apid) {
+ WARN_ONCE(true, "spurious spmi irq received for apid=%d\n",
+ apid);
+ continue;
+ }
enable = readl_relaxed(
ver_ops->acc_enable(pmic_arb, apid));
if (enable & SPMI_PIC_ACC_ENABLE_BIT)
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists