[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YQHRV/uEZ4LqPVNI@t490s>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 17:51:19 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: X86: Optimize pte_list_desc with per-array
counter
On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 09:04:30PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > struct pte_list_desc {
> > u64 *sptes[PTE_LIST_EXT];
> > + /*
> > + * Stores number of entries stored in the pte_list_desc. No need to be
> > + * u64 but just for easier alignment. When PTE_LIST_EXT, means full.
> > + */
> > + u64 spte_count;
>
> Per my feedback to the previous patch, this should be above sptes[] so that rmaps
> with <8 SPTEs only touch one cache line. No idea if it actually matters in
> practice, but I can't see how it would harm anything.
Reasonable. Not sure whether this would change the numbers a bit in the commit
message; it can be slightly better but also possible to be non-observable.
Paolo, let me know if you want me to repost/retest with the change (along with
keeping the comment in the other patch).
Thanks for looking!
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists