[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a86eadf-41fe-256e-2656-b9a13f73d88f@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:55:19 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: yebin <yebin10@...wei.com>, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATH v2] scsi: scsi_dh_rdac: Avoid crash during rdac_bus_attach
On 7/28/21 7:24 AM, yebin wrote:
> On 2021/7/23 12:04, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> On 1/12/21 10:31 PM, Ye Bin wrote:
>>> sdev->handler_data = NULL;
>>> + synchronize_rcu();
>>> kfree(h);
>> What is the purpose of the new synchronize_rcu() call?
> Thanks for your reply.
> Yes, I add new synchronize_rcu() call is to wait until *h is no longer
> in use. If free
> "h" right now , mybe lead to UAF.
>> If its purpose is
>> to wait until *h is no longer in use, please use kfree_rcu() instead.
> struct rdac_dh_data {
> struct list_head node;
> .....
> }
> As rdac_dh_data.node type is "struct list_head", but kfree_rcu the
> first parameter type is
> "struct rcu_head". So we can only use synchronize_rcu() at here.
Ah, that's right. Hence:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists