linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] staging: r8188eu: add newer/better RTL8188eu driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA=Fs0=bQt8Msaw_CjgjAsmQFjm6U3bag76K9uKHVfMPaehtvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jul 2021 23:17:04 +0100
From:   Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>,
        Martin Kaiser <martin@...ser.cx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] staging: r8188eu: add newer/better RTL8188eu driver

On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 19:55, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 01:41:15PM -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> > On 7/28/21 1:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Hm, I thought this would be in better shape than it is.
> > >
> > > Right now we have 107 .c and .h files in drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/ that
> > > come to a total of 44597 lines.
> > >
> > > So we are taking double the size here?
> > >
> > > I'm all for putting a "better" driver in here, but this feels odd to
> > > me...  Is there major new functionality here that is not in the existing
> > > driver to justify this?
> > >
> > > Ok, let's see how this goes, I'll give it a few weeks to see how much
> > > can easily be fixed up to hopefully get back to at least close the
> > > existing driver size...
> >
> > The major new functionality is that the new one uses cfg80211, whereas the
> > old one uses the WEXT calls.
>
> Ok, that's worth it alone.
>
> > It really is an improvement. It just needs a severe cleanup.
> >
> > I warned you that this code was rough. It took me several weeks to get the
> > old one "ready" for staging. I never devoted that effort to the new one, and
> > you wanted it in a place where multiple authors could improve it.
>
> Fair enough, I did ask for it :)
>
> I'll go through and do a license cleanup tomorrow morning to start with,
> that should knock a bunch of lines off right away...
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Just stripping the debug code out of this version again will free up
quite a few lines I think as well :-) Will get started on that.

Regards,
Phil