linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: trusted: fix use as module when CONFIG_TCG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f0f05df9-95bb-8b67-cecc-742af0b19f1e@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 29 Jul 2021 00:29:38 +0200
From:   Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc:     James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        Andreas Rammhold <andreas@...mhold.de>,
        David Gstir <david@...ma-star.at>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KEYS: trusted: fix use as module when CONFIG_TCG_TPM=m

On 28.07.21 23:52, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 06:24:49AM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> On 27.07.21 05:04, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>>>> Reported-by: Andreas Rammhold <andreas@...mhold.de>
>>>> Fixes: 5d0682be3189 ("KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
>>>
>>> Is it absolutely need to do all this *just* to fix the bug?
>>>
>>> For a pure bug fix the most essential thing is to be able the backport
>>> it to stable kernels.
>>
>> Not much happened in-between, so a backport should be trivial.
>> I can provide these if needed.
> 
> "not much" is not good enough. It should be "not anything".

"Not much" [code that could conflict was added in-between].

I just checked and it applies cleanly on v5.13. On the off chance
that this patch conflicts with another stable backport by the time
it's backported, I'll get a friendly automated email and send out
a rebased patch.

Cheers,
Ahmad


> 
> /Jarkko
> 


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |