linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 1/7] x86/sgx: Provide indication of life-cycle of EPC pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f2685d7c8dc14792a4e0f9807f742ea6@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 28 Jul 2021 22:57:07 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
CC:     "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/7] x86/sgx: Provide indication of life-cycle of EPC
 pages

> Wouldn't it be safer to do something like:
>
>	page->owner = owner ? owner : (void *)-1;
>
> -1 is non-NULL, but also invalid, which makes it harder for us to poke
> ourselves in the eye.

Does Linux have some #define INVALID_POINTER thing that
provides a guaranteed bad (e.g. non-canonical) value?

(void *)-1 seems hacky.

-Tony